IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamist/v52y2001i10p785-796.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A unified maximum likelihood approach to document retrieval

Author

Listed:
  • David Bodoff
  • Daniel Enache
  • Ajit Kambil
  • Gary Simon
  • Alex Yukhimets

Abstract

Empirical work shows significant benefits from using relevance feedback data to improve information retrieval (IR) performance. Still, one fundamental difficulty has limited the ability to fully exploit this valuable data. The problem is that it is not clear whether the relevance feedback data should be used to train the system about what the users really mean, or about what the documents really mean. In this paper, we resolve the question using a maximum likelihood framework. We show how all the available data can be used to simultaneously estimate both documents and queries in proportions that are optimal in a maximum likelihood sense. The resulting algorithm is directly applicable to many approaches to IR, and the unified framework can help explain previously reported results as well as guide the search for new methods that utilize feedback data in IR.

Suggested Citation

  • David Bodoff & Daniel Enache & Ajit Kambil & Gary Simon & Alex Yukhimets, 2001. "A unified maximum likelihood approach to document retrieval," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 52(10), pages 785-796.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:52:y:2001:i:10:p:785-796
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.1137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1137
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.1137?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:52:y:2001:i:10:p:785-796. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.