IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamest/v51y2000i6p508-520.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Individual differences and the conundrums of user‐centered design: Two experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Bryce Allen

Abstract

Individual differences between users of information systems can influence search performance. In user‐centered design it is important to match users with system configurations that will optimize their performance. Two matching strategies were explored in the first experiment: the capitalization match, and the compensatory match. Findings suggest that a compensatory match is likely to be encountered more frequently in designing information systems. Having determined an optimal match between users and system configurations, it is necessary to find ways to ensure that users are guided to the appropriate configuration. The second experiment examined user selection of system configurations, and concluded that users do not act to optimize system configuration when they select features. This result suggests that information systems must have mechanisms such as user models to direct users to optimal configurations. These experiments suggest some of the complexities and problems encountered in applying individual differences research to user‐centered design of information systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Bryce Allen, 2000. "Individual differences and the conundrums of user‐centered design: Two experiments," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 51(6), pages 508-520.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:51:y:2000:i:6:p:508-520
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:63.0.CO;2-Q
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:63.0.CO;2-Q
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:63.0.CO;2-Q?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:51:y:2000:i:6:p:508-520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.