IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamest/v47y1996i5p338-356.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A system for analyzing cataloging rules: A feasibility study

Author

Listed:
  • Shoichi Taniguchi

Abstract

The quality control of cataloging standards is as important as the quality control of bibliographic records. In order to aid the quality control of cataloging standards, a prototype system to analyze the ambiguity and complexity of cataloging rules was developed. Before developing the system, a standard rule unit was defined and a simple, function‐like format was devised to indicate the syntactic structure of each unit rule. The AACR2 Chapter 1 rules were then manually transformed into this function‐like, unit rule format. The system reads the manually transformed unit rules and puts them into their basic forms based on their syntactic components. The system then applies rule‐templates, which are skeletal schemata for specific types of cataloging rules, to the converted rules. As a result of this rule‐template application, the internal structure of each unit rule is determined. The system is also used to explore inter‐rule relationships. That is, the system determines whether two rules have an exclusive, parallel, complementary, or non‐relationship. These relationships are based on the analysis of the structural parts described above in terms of the given rule‐template. To assist in this process, the system applies external knowledge represented in the same fashion as the rule units themselves. Although the prototype system can handle only a restricted range of rules, the proposed approach is positively validated and shown to be useful. However, it is possibly impractical to build a complete rule‐analyzing system of this type at this stage. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Suggested Citation

  • Shoichi Taniguchi, 1996. "A system for analyzing cataloging rules: A feasibility study," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 47(5), pages 338-356, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:47:y:1996:i:5:p:338-356
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199605)47:53.0.CO;2-X
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199605)47:53.0.CO;2-X
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199605)47:53.0.CO;2-X?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:47:y:1996:i:5:p:338-356. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.