IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamest/v46y1995i1p30-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Domain analysis, literary warrant, and consensus: The case of fiction studies

Author

Listed:
  • Clare Beghtol

Abstract

This article reports research that used descriptor subfields in MLA Bibliography online to quantify literary warrant in the domain of scholary work about fiction (i.e., “fiction studies”). The research used Hulme's concept of literary warrant and Kernan's description of the interactive processes of literature and literary scholarship to justify quantifying existing subject indexing in existing bibliographic records as a first step in the domain analysis of a field. It was found that certain of the MLA Bibliography online's descriptor subfields and certain of the descriptor terms within those subfields occurred more often than would occur by chance. The techniques used in the research might be extended to domain analysis of other fields. Use of the methodology might improve the ability to evaluate existing and to design future subject access systems. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Suggested Citation

  • Clare Beghtol, 1995. "Domain analysis, literary warrant, and consensus: The case of fiction studies," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 46(1), pages 30-44, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:46:y:1995:i:1:p:30-44
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199501)46:13.0.CO;2-F
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199501)46:13.0.CO;2-F
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199501)46:13.0.CO;2-F?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:46:y:1995:i:1:p:30-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.