IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jacrfn/v34y2022i3p82-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Should Private Companies Have the Same SEC Disclosure Requirements as Public Companies? A Debate

Author

Listed:
  • Ludovic Phalippou
  • Gregory Brown

Abstract

As with any important policy decision, the question of mandated disclosure for private equity must weigh the potential benefits against the costs of implementation. At the 2022 Private Equity Research Symposium hosted by Oxford University, Oxford's Ludovic Phalippou and UNC‐Chapel Hill's Gregory Brown debated the merits of greater mandated financial reporting for private companies. Phalippou's arguments in favor of more disclosure center on the potential lack of alignment between private equity fund general partners (GPs) and limited partners (LPs), which can distort the incentives of GPs to be transparent and honest with LPs. Brown's arguments against increasing mandated disclosure focus on the potentially large costs associated with substantially more reporting, especially for smaller companies. These costs could change the landscape of private investments in a way that reduces investment in innovative, high‐growth companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Ludovic Phalippou & Gregory Brown, 2022. "Should Private Companies Have the Same SEC Disclosure Requirements as Public Companies? A Debate," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 34(3), pages 82-87, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jacrfn:v:34:y:2022:i:3:p:82-87
    DOI: 10.1111/jacf.12519
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12519
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jacf.12519?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jacrfn:v:34:y:2022:i:3:p:82-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1078-1196 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.