IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jacrfn/v30y2018i1p62-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fundamental Investors Reduce the Distraction on Management from Random Market “Noise†: Evidence from France

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandre Garel
  • Jean†Florent Rérolle

Abstract

The authors find that financial markets have real effects on corporate decisions but that, unfortunately, some temporary market enthusiasm, unrelated to firm intrinsic value, may cause management to make value†destroying decisions as the result of random and uninformed stock market volatility. In particular, they are prone to making bad decisions after stock market overreactions to “surprise†earnings announcements. This study shows a positive effect of greater long†term ownership on French listed firms. Fundamental investor ownership reduces the degree of market mispricing which serves long†run shareholder value maximization. A fundamental investor is one that, on average, hold his shares for at least two years, is in the top quartile of a firm ownership, and has an active allocation strategy. They are about 8% of all investors. Compared to non†fundamental investors, fundamental investors hold their positions on average three times longer and have positions 1.5 times larger. Fundamental investors are more present in firms which have more liquid stocks, which pay dividends, and which are relatively poorer performers and have relatively lower market†to†book than their industry peers.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandre Garel & Jean†Florent Rérolle, 2018. "Fundamental Investors Reduce the Distraction on Management from Random Market “Noise†: Evidence from France," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 30(1), pages 62-69, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jacrfn:v:30:y:2018:i:1:p:62-69
    DOI: 10.1111/jacf.12278
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12278
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jacf.12278?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jacrfn:v:30:y:2018:i:1:p:62-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1078-1196 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.