IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jacrfn/v29y2017i4p134-137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maximum Withdrawal Rates: A Novel and Useful Tool

Author

Listed:
  • Javier Estrada

Abstract

Even after accumulating a portfolio of investment assets, retirees still need to know how much of their wealth they can spend each year without risking running out of money before they die. Traditionally, financial advisers use extensive simulation to predict a “failure rate†(i.e. the probability of a retiree running out of money before they die). Unfortunately, the failure rate approach is flawed because strategies with the same failure rate may not be comparable overall. For example, different withdrawal strategies may have the same failure rate but wind up leaving significantly different amounts of wealth behind. Instead of failure rate, this author recommends using the maximum withdrawal rate, or MWR, approach that predetermines a desired bequest (which could be zero or some positive sum), thus enabling an apples†to†apples comparison of retirement strategies. In addition to permitting direct comparisons of retirement strategies, the MWR provides a way to assess how likely a retiree is to sustain a target sequence of inflation†adjusted withdrawals. This is the main advantage of the MWR; it is a single tool that can be used to explore two of the most important issues in retirement analysis. The MWR as presented here is essentially a measure of the best a retiree could have done had he known the future returns of his portfolio. Obviously, one cannot be sure of future rates of return ahead of time, so the MWR does not eliminate all retirement risk. That said, its adoption would be an improvement upon current practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Javier Estrada, 2017. "Maximum Withdrawal Rates: A Novel and Useful Tool," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 29(4), pages 134-137, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jacrfn:v:29:y:2017:i:4:p:134-137
    DOI: 10.1111/jacf.12268
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12268
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jacf.12268?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jacrfn:v:29:y:2017:i:4:p:134-137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1078-1196 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.