IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jacrfn/v18y2006i1p95-103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Allocation in Retirement Plans: A Better Solution

Author

Listed:
  • Donald E. Fuerst

Abstract

The corporate world is reconsidering the cost‐effectiveness of defined benefit pension plans while contemplating a change to defined contribution plans. This article begins by examining the three primary risks faced by sponsors of most DB pension plans—investment risk, interest rate risk, and longevity risk—and shows how shifting these risks to employees through a DC plan would affect both the corporation and the individual. Although DC plans clearly help companies manage risks, they provide at best an incomplete solution for individual participants. This article describes an innovation in pension design—the Retirement Shares Plan (RSP)—that combines many of the best features of DB and DC plans. An RSP provides: • predictable and stable cost to the plan sponsor, with little chance of unfunded liabilities; • lifetime income, guaranteeing that retirees will never outlive their benefits; • a benefit accrual pattern comparable to that of traditional pension plans that preserves value for older, long‐service employees; and • potential inflation protection for retirees. The RSP accomplishes this by allocating risk to sponsors and individuals differently than either a traditional DB plan or a DC plan. Unlike most DB plans, the RSP shifts investment and interest rate risks from plan sponsors to participants. Unlike DC plans, the RSP keeps longevity risk with the sponsor.

Suggested Citation

  • Donald E. Fuerst, 2006. "Risk Allocation in Retirement Plans: A Better Solution," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 18(1), pages 95-103, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jacrfn:v:18:y:2006:i:1:p:95-103
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6622.2006.00077.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.2006.00077.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1745-6622.2006.00077.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jacrfn:v:18:y:2006:i:1:p:95-103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1078-1196 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.