IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jacrfn/v17y2005i3p95-101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Proposal for Expensing Employee Compensatory Stock Options for Financial Reporting Purposes

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Hancock
  • Roberto G. Mendoza
  • Robert C. Merton

Abstract

This article presents an accounting approach for employee stock options based on the insight that the currentperiod compensation expense should reflect only that part of the option value that is earned independent of the obligation of continued employment. Given that the maturity of vested options is typically shortened to 90 days when an employee resigns or is terminated, this method views the employee as owning a 90‐day option (even if the stated maturity of the option is ten years) and earning a 90‐day extension to that option each quarter as a result of the employee's continued employment. In the case of vested options, the compensation expense in each quarterly accounting period is thus the value of the 90‐day extension of the option's maturity. There is no option expense in the quarter when the option is either exercised or expires. In the case of unvested options, the expected option value at vesting should be estimated quarterly starting at the time of grant and the corresponding estimated expense should be revised and allocated as a pro rata accrual each quarter over the vesting period. The cumulative expense over the entire vesting period will equal the fair market value of the option at its vesting date. Besides reflecting the economics of the exchange of value for labor involved in stock option grants, this approach has a number of practical advantages: • The 90‐day maturity permits the use of publicly traded options to determine fair market value and makes Black‐Scholes and other (lattice) pricing models more reliable. • The shortened maturity eliminates the need to adjust for early exercise or employee attrition. • Consistent application should lead to a greater degree of comparability in option valuation and expense allocation among companies (including those that use restricted stock instead of options).

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Hancock & Roberto G. Mendoza & Robert C. Merton, 2005. "A Proposal for Expensing Employee Compensatory Stock Options for Financial Reporting Purposes," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 17(3), pages 95-101, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jacrfn:v:17:y:2005:i:3:p:95-101
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6622.2005.00048.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.2005.00048.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1745-6622.2005.00048.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jacrfn:v:17:y:2005:i:3:p:95-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1078-1196 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.