IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jacrfn/v17y2005i2p82-86.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Decline and Fall of Joint Ventures: How JVs Became Unpopular and Why That Could Change

Author

Listed:
  • Dieter Turowski

Abstract

The peak year for joint venture formation was 1995, which saw almost 5,700 new ventures. Since then, however, JV activity has gone into a sharp decline, with 2004 setting a new 10‐year low of just over 700 new deals, and many executives have completely dismissed joint ventures as a vehicle for growth. But is this the right conclusion? Perhaps for some companies. But for most, the answer may be to use the lessons from past failures to improve their ability to negotiate and manage joint ventures. This article offers five main pieces of advice: • Don't rely too much on experience from negotiating acquisitions. JVs require a more balanced, less competitive negotiating style that can help set the tone for a good relationship. • Don't allow the contract to dominate the relationship. If JV agreements are crafted more with the aim of building trust and achieving a shared understanding than designing explicit provisions for all contingencies, the parties will have stronger incentives to seek business solutions instead of legal remedies. • Weigh carefully the value of commitment versus the value of flexibility. Although the ability to exit a bad deal clearly has option value, there may be greater value from the stability achieved by locking oneself into a relationship. • Resist the urge for certainty in termination clauses. A “process‐oriented” approach will typically be more fair, resulting in smoother negotiations and a better working relationship, than an “outcome‐oriented” approach. • Recognize when a JV has outlived its useful life, and do something about it before value is destroyed.

Suggested Citation

  • Dieter Turowski, 2005. "The Decline and Fall of Joint Ventures: How JVs Became Unpopular and Why That Could Change," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 17(2), pages 82-86, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jacrfn:v:17:y:2005:i:2:p:82-86
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6622.2005.00034.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.2005.00034.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1745-6622.2005.00034.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Spencer A. Case & D. Scott Lee & John D. Martin, 2007. "The potential for expropriation through joint ventures," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), pages 111-126.
    2. Case, Spencer A. & Lee, D. Scott & Martin, John D., 2007. "The potential for expropriation through joint ventures," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 111-126.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jacrfn:v:17:y:2005:i:2:p:82-86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1078-1196 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.