IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jacrfn/v12y2000i4p94-101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Private Company Discount

Author

Listed:
  • John Koeplin
  • Atulya Sarin
  • Alan C. Shapiro

Abstract

When appraisers or investment bankers value privately held companies by making comparisons to otherwise similar public companies, they typically apply a discount. Most practitioners attribute this discount mainly to the relative illiquidity of private companies; and, for this reason, they value private companies based on empirical studies designed to measure illiquidity discounts. But this assumption and the valuations based upon it are likely to be unreliable because private companies are valued differently than public companies owing to a variety of other, more “fundamental” factors that have caused the firm to stay private rather than choosing to list on an exchange. This article presents an alternative framework to estimate the discount for private companies that computes four separate valuation multiples for a set of private transactions and a comparable set of public transactions. After comparing these four sets of multiples for both domestic and foreign firms, the authors reach the following conclusions: ▪ Domestic private companies are acquired at an average 20–30% discount relative to similar public companies when using earnings (more precisely, EBIT and EBITDA) multiples as the basis for valuing the transactions. The average discount measured using price‐ to‐book value multiples are somewhat lower, and there are no significant differences between the revenue multiples of acquired private and public companies. ▪ The private company discounts are larger for foreign companies. Non‐U.S. private companies are acquired at an average discount of 40–50% relative to similar public companies when using earnings multiples to value the transactions. (However, the measured discount is not as statistically significant as for domestic companies be cause of the higher variation in the multiples of foreign companies, probably due to differences in accounting standards between countries.) Also, there are no statistically significant differences between the revenue multiples and the book value multiples of acquired foreign private and public companies.

Suggested Citation

  • John Koeplin & Atulya Sarin & Alan C. Shapiro, 2000. "The Private Company Discount," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 12(4), pages 94-101, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jacrfn:v:12:y:2000:i:4:p:94-101
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6622.2000.tb00022.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.2000.tb00022.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1745-6622.2000.tb00022.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jacrfn:v:12:y:2000:i:4:p:94-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1078-1196 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.