IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jacrfn/v11y1998i1p78-88.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who Wins In Large Stock Buybacks – Those Who Sell Or Those Who Hold?

Author

Listed:
  • William McNally

Abstract

Both fixed‐price and dutch auction repurchases offer large premiums over current values to tendering shareholders. And, because announcements of such offers are generally accompanied by significant increases in stock prices, economists view selftender offers as mechanisms for signaling undervaluation. Using samples of fixed‐price and dutch auction self‐tender offers from the 1980s, this study attempts to answer the following questions: Are non‐tendering shareholders fully compensated for the premium wealth transfer by the increase in the intrinsic value of their shares? Since fixed‐price offers feature larger premiums, are they accompanied by larger increases in intrinsic value (or do insiders have a tendency to “overpay” in fixed‐price offers)? Is the premium wealth transfer a big component of the returns to the two shareholder groups—and what percentage of firm value does the transfer represent? The findings of this study, unlike those reported by earlier research, suggest that the two types of offers generate roughly the same total returns (about 10–11%, on average, during the offering period) to shareholders who do not tender. Fixed‐price offers involve considerably larger premiums (over the new, “full‐information” price) and wealth transfers than dutch auctions. Reflecting the higher premiums, shareholders tendering into fixed‐price offers receive higher returns than those tendering into dutch auctions (13.8% vs. 11.3% during the announcement period). But while fixed‐price offers involve a considerably larger wealth transfer from non‐tendering to tendering shareholders, fixed‐price repurchases compensate the non‐tendering shareholders for the larger wealth transfer with larger increases in “intrinsic value,” thus generating the same total return as dutch auctions. Moreover, despite the large premiums offered in both types of offers, the wealth transfer implicit in the premium represents a small cost (less than 1% in fixed‐price offers, and less than 0.1% in dutch auctions) to non‐tendering shareholders.

Suggested Citation

  • William McNally, 1998. "Who Wins In Large Stock Buybacks – Those Who Sell Or Those Who Hold?," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 11(1), pages 78-88, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jacrfn:v:11:y:1998:i:1:p:78-88
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6622.1998.tb00079.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.1998.tb00079.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1745-6622.1998.tb00079.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ishwar P., 2010. "Stock Price Responses to the Announcement of Buyback of Shares in India," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 1(1), pages 14-29, November.
    2. repec:dau:papers:123456789/9849 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jacrfn:v:11:y:1998:i:1:p:78-88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1078-1196 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.