IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/istatr/v94y2026i2p242-263.html

A New Evaluation Strategy for Diagnostic Tests Under Umbrella or Tree Ordering

Author

Listed:
  • Duc‐Khanh To
  • Gianfranco Adimari
  • Monica Chiogna

Abstract

In medical research, diagnostic tests (or biomarkers) with continuous values are widely employed to attempt to distinguish between diseased and non‐diseased subjects. The diagnostic accuracy of a test can be assessed by its receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. For diseases with multiclasses, an important category of scenarios assumes tree or umbrella ordering, where the test measurement for one particular class is lower or higher than those for the other classes. In this paper, we propose a new ROC framework for tree or umbrella ordering, together with a related evaluation strategy. Such a strategy is based on new ROC representations on the plane, denoted as LTROC and UTROC, and new summary indexes. Related statistical inference is also discussed. In particular, we propose simple estimation and interval estimation procedures, in a nonparametric setting. For these procedures, we provide theoretical justification and assess the behaviour in finite samples through simulation experiments. Finally, we illustrate the proposed approach with two real data examples.

Suggested Citation

  • Duc‐Khanh To & Gianfranco Adimari & Monica Chiogna, 2026. "A New Evaluation Strategy for Diagnostic Tests Under Umbrella or Tree Ordering," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 94(2), pages 242-263, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:istatr:v:94:y:2026:i:2:p:242-263
    DOI: 10.1111/insr.12612
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/insr.12612
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/insr.12612?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:istatr:v:94:y:2026:i:2:p:242-263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isiiinl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.