IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/istatr/v93y2025i1p130-149.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Optimised Optional Randomised Response Technique

Author

Listed:
  • Kavya Pushadapu
  • Sarjinder Singh
  • Stephen A. Sedory

Abstract

In this paper, we begin by reviewing the optional randomised response technique estimator (ORRTE) developed by Chaudhuri and Mukerjee for estimating the proportion of a sensitive characteristic in a population. We show that their estimator is unbiased and has smaller variance than the Warner's estimator. Then we make an attempt at developing an optimised optional randomised response technique estimator (OORRTE). The proposed OORRTE is shown to be more efficient than the ORRTE. Findings from simulation studies are discussed and interpreted for various situations. Sample sizes for the Warner's estimator, the ORRTE and the OORRTE are computed based on power analysis introduced by Ulrich, Schroter, Striegel and Simon. Finally, we include an application to real data on COVID‐19 by considering it to be partially sensitive variable; that is, sensitive to some but not to others. The data used are included in the paper and the R‐codes used in the simulation study are documented in online material.

Suggested Citation

  • Kavya Pushadapu & Sarjinder Singh & Stephen A. Sedory, 2025. "An Optimised Optional Randomised Response Technique," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 93(1), pages 130-149, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:istatr:v:93:y:2025:i:1:p:130-149
    DOI: 10.1111/insr.12581
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/insr.12581
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/insr.12581?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:istatr:v:93:y:2025:i:1:p:130-149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isiiinl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.