IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/istatr/v89y2021i1p132-147.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Survey of Differentially Private Regression for Clinical and Epidemiological Research

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph Ficek
  • Wei Wang
  • Henian Chen
  • Getachew Dagne
  • Ellen Daley

Abstract

Differential privacy is a framework for data analysis that provides rigorous privacy protections for database participants. It has increasingly been accepted as the gold standard for privacy in the analytics industry, yet there are few techniques suitable for statistical inference in the health sciences. This is notably the case for regression, one of the most widely used modelling tools in clinical and epidemiological studies. This paper provides an overview of differential privacy and surveys the literature on differentially private regression, highlighting the techniques that hold the most relevance for statistical inference as practiced in clinical and epidemiological research. Research gaps and opportunities for further inquiry are identified.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph Ficek & Wei Wang & Henian Chen & Getachew Dagne & Ellen Daley, 2021. "A Survey of Differentially Private Regression for Clinical and Epidemiological Research," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 89(1), pages 132-147, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:istatr:v:89:y:2021:i:1:p:132-147
    DOI: 10.1111/insr.12391
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/insr.12391
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/insr.12391?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:mpr:mprres:6177 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Darren B Taichman & Peush Sahni & Anja Pinborg & Larry Peiperl & Christine Laine & Astrid James & Sung-Tae Hong & Abraham Haileamlak & Laragh Gollogly & Fiona Godlee & Frank A Frizelle & Fernando Flor, 2017. "Data Sharing Statements for Clinical Trials: A Requirement of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-3, June.
    3. Chris Skinner, 2012. "Statistical Disclosure Risk: Separating Potential and Harm," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 80(3), pages 349-368, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christian Thiele & Gerrit Hirschfeld & Ruth Brachel, 2021. "Clinical trial registries as Scientometric data: A novel solution for linking and deduplicating clinical trials from multiple registries," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(12), pages 9733-9750, December.
    2. Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan & Sarafoglou, Alexandra & Aarts, Sil Dr. & Albers, Casper J & Algermissen, Johannes & Bahník, Štěpán & van Dongen, Noah N'Djaye Nikolai & Hoekstra, Rink & Moreau, David & van Rav, 2021. "Toward More Transparency in Statistical Practice," MetaArXiv t93cg, Center for Open Science.
    3. Ian Lundberg & Arvind Narayanan & Karen Levy & Matthew Salganik, 2018. "Privacy, ethics, and data access: A case study of the Fragile Families Challenge," Working Papers wp18-09-ff, Princeton University, School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Research on Child Wellbeing..
    4. Ritchie, Felix, 2017. "Spontaneous recognition: an unnecessary control on data access?," Statistics Paper Series 24, European Central Bank.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:istatr:v:89:y:2021:i:1:p:132-147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isiiinl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.