IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/istatr/v86y2018i2p300-321.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Identification Risk in Microdata Release and Its Control by Post‐randomisation

Author

Listed:
  • Tapan K. Nayak
  • Cheng Zhang
  • Jiashen You

Abstract

Statistical agencies often release a masked or perturbed version of survey data to protect the confidentiality of respondents' information. Ideally, a perturbation procedure should provide confidentiality protection without much loss of data quality, so that the released data may practically be treated as original data for making inferences. One major objective is to control the risk of correctly identifying any respondent's records in released data, by matching the values of some identifying or key variables. For categorical key variables, we propose a new approach to measuring identification risk and setting strict disclosure control goals. The general idea is to ensure that the probability of correctly identifying any respondent or surveyed unit is at most ξ, which is pre‐specified. Then, we develop an unbiased post‐randomisation procedure that achieves this goal for ξ>1/3. The procedure allows substantial control over possible changes to the original data, and the variance it induces is of a lower order of magnitude than sampling variance. We apply the procedure to a real data set, where it performs consistently with the theoretical results and quite importantly, shows very little data quality loss.

Suggested Citation

  • Tapan K. Nayak & Cheng Zhang & Jiashen You, 2018. "Measuring Identification Risk in Microdata Release and Its Control by Post‐randomisation," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 86(2), pages 300-321, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:istatr:v:86:y:2018:i:2:p:300-321
    DOI: 10.1111/insr.12252
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/insr.12252
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/insr.12252?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:istatr:v:86:y:2018:i:2:p:300-321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isiiinl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.