IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/irvfin/v18y2018i4p637-688.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Best of Times, the Worst of Times: Testing which Behavioral Biases Affect Analyst Forecasts

Author

Listed:
  • Yuk Ying Chang
  • Wei‐Huei Hsu

Abstract

Mood‐induced optimism, cognitive inaccuracy, and distraction can affect analyst forecasts. This study compares and contrasts these influences. The novelty of our approach is that we first show that these behavioral biases have different implications for analysts’ forecast errors conditioned on the errors being positive and negative. We then use proxies for positive and negative moods to empirically test the support for each of these biases. Consistent with cognitive precision, we find that analysts make less (more) accurate forecasts when they are in positive (negative) moods. We further show that these results are driven neither by sentiment associated with contemporaneous economic or market conditions nor by under‐ or overreaction to more bad news released on days immediately before weekends or holidays.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuk Ying Chang & Wei‐Huei Hsu, 2018. "The Best of Times, the Worst of Times: Testing which Behavioral Biases Affect Analyst Forecasts," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 18(4), pages 637-688, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:irvfin:v:18:y:2018:i:4:p:637-688
    DOI: 10.1111/irfi.12168
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/irfi.12168
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/irfi.12168?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:irvfin:v:18:y:2018:i:4:p:637-688. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1369-412X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.