IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/intfin/v29y2026i2p520-530.html

Lost in Translation: Why Distance Undermines Institutional Monitoring on Earnings Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Hong Kee Sul
  • Chune Young Chung
  • Huy Pham

Abstract

This study examines how institutional distance shapes the effectiveness of institutional investors' monitoring of corporate earnings quality. Using a sample of 3125 firm‐year observations for non‐US firms cross‐listed on US exchanges from 2001 to 2017, we distinguish between two forms of proximity: geographic proximity, which captures the informational advantages of home‐country institutions (IO_Home), and market proximity, which reflects US institutions' familiarity with the listing market (IO_US). We employ panel regressions with firm and year fixed effects and double‐clustered standard errors and find a significant and positive association between IO_Home and all three earnings attributes: persistence, value relevance and timeliness. In contrast, IO_US shows no significant monitoring effect. These findings support the geographic proximity advantage over the market proximity advantage. Moreover, geographic advantage exerts a stronger effect in firms with greater information opacity (proxied by research and development intensity) and remains robust in instrumental variable estimation that addresses selection endogeneity. Our results highlight the critical role of geographic closeness, rather than market familiarity, in determining institutional monitoring effectiveness on earnings quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Hong Kee Sul & Chune Young Chung & Huy Pham, 2026. "Lost in Translation: Why Distance Undermines Institutional Monitoring on Earnings Quality," International Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 520-530, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:intfin:v:29:y:2026:i:2:p:520-530
    DOI: 10.1111/infi.70046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/infi.70046
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/infi.70046?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:intfin:v:29:y:2026:i:2:p:520-530. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1367-0271 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.