IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v8y2004i1-2p93-118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision Analysis Utilizing Data from Multiple Life‐Cycle Impact Assessment Methods Part I: A Theoretical Basis

Author

Listed:
  • Mansour Rahimi
  • Merrill Weidner

Abstract

Numerous methodologies for the life‐cycle impact assessment (LCIA) step of life‐cycle assessment (LCA) are currently in popular use. These methods, which are based on a single method or level of analysis, are limited to the environmental fates, impact categories, damage functions, and stressors included in the method or model. Because of this, it has been suggested within the LCA community that LCIA data from multiple methods and/or levels of analysis, that is, end‐point and midpoint indicators, be used in LCA‐based decision analysis to facilitate better or, at least more informed, decision making. In this (two‐part) series of articles, we develop and present a series of LCA‐based decision analysis models, based on multiattribute value theory (MAVT), which utilize data from multiple LCIA methods and/or levels of analysis. The key to accomplishing this is the recognition of what LCIA damage indicators represent with respect to decision analysis, namely, decision attributes and, in most cases, proxy attributes. The use of proxy attributes in a decision model, however, poses certain challenges, such as the assessment of decision‐maker preferences for actual consequences that are only known imprecisely because of inherent limits of both LCA and scientific knowledge. In this article (part I), we provide a brief overview of MAVT and examine some of the decision‐theoretic issues and implications of current LCIA methods. We illustrate the application of MAVT to develop a decision model utilizing damage indicators from a single LCIA methodology; and, we identify the decision‐theoretic issues that arise when attempting to combine LCIA indicators from multiple methods and/or levels of analysis in a single decision model. Finally, we introduce the use in our methodology of constructed attributes to combine related end‐point damage indicators into single decision attributes and the concept and evaluation of proxy attributes.

Suggested Citation

  • Mansour Rahimi & Merrill Weidner, 2004. "Decision Analysis Utilizing Data from Multiple Life‐Cycle Impact Assessment Methods Part I: A Theoretical Basis," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 8(1‐2), pages 93-118, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:8:y:2004:i:1-2:p:93-118
    DOI: 10.1162/1088198041269454
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/1088198041269454
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/1088198041269454?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:8:y:2004:i:1-2:p:93-118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.