Author
Abstract
Bodh Gaya, a small agrarian town in Bihar, India, is renowned as the cradle of Buddhism. The Mahabodhi Temple in Bodh Gaya was designated as a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2002. Every year, millions of visitors come here to quench their spiritual thirst. Consequently, the town is experiencing significant strain on its water resource capacity due to tourism and haphazard urbanization. Water metabolism of such small touristic and religious towns, along with the impact of tourists' water demand on urban water flows and infrastructure, remains largely unexplored. This study aims to evaluate water flows pre‐ and post‐the designation of World Heritage status and examine tourism's impact on water resources and socio‐economic inequalities in access to water supply infrastructure by using a political industrial ecology (PIE) approach. A complementary PIE approach, integrating the water mass balance equation with urban political ecology, is employed through methods such as document analysis and semi‐structured interviews. The urban water metabolism of Bodh Gaya underwent a drastic transformation between 2001 and 2019 (pre‐ and post‐the World Heritage designation). Direct tourist consumption increased approximately eightfold, rising from 92 to 730 million liters (ML), and groundwater extraction increased from 1586 to 4271 ML over the same period. The political ecology analysis reveals that residents struggle to access piped water due to precarious infrastructure, fragmented governance, and persistent social inequalities. To address water scarcity, the town has paradoxically shifted to a distant water source rather than leveraging available water in the urban system, such as stormwater and wastewater, to meet demand. Lastly, we recommend integrating tourists' water demands into broader urban planning for sustainable water management.
Suggested Citation
Ritika Rajput & Jian Pu, 2025.
"A political industrial ecology of water in Bodh Gaya, India: Pre‐ and Post‐the World Heritage designation,"
Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 29(6), pages 2324-2337, December.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:inecol:v:29:y:2025:i:6:p:2324-2337
DOI: 10.1111/jiec.70112
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:29:y:2025:i:6:p:2324-2337. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.