Author
Listed:
- Mudit Chordia
- Evelina Wikner
- Anders Nordelöf
- Ketan Vaidya
- Rickard Arvidsson
Abstract
Life cycle assessment of several common lithium‐ion battery (LIB) cell designs is hindered by lack of cell‐specific large‐scale production data. This issue is further exacerbated by the fact that automotive manufacturers deploy diverse LIB cell types optimized to meet specific application demands through variations in chemistry, internal design, and format, posing significant challenges in assessing the environmental impacts of different cell types. To address this, this study proposes a parameterization methodology that links cell design parameters, such as electrode and casing area, and cell energy with production processes to investigate the influence of cell type on climate and resources impacts. The parameterization methodology is applied across 14 cell types employing graphite and nickel manganese cobalt oxide electrodes, varying in format, internal design, and nickel content. Results reveal substantial variability in energy demand during production when reported per cell, ranging from 1 to 30 kWh/cell for electricity and 2 to 50 MJ/cell for cooling. When reported per kWhcell the variation is smaller, 61–63 kWh/kWhcell for electricity and 107 MJ/kWhcell for cooling. Impacts of power‐optimized cells are higher than energy‐optimized cells due to larger negative electrodes of the former. Cylindrical cells have lower impacts than prismatic cells owing to their superior volumetric efficiency. Higher volumetric efficiency of single‐ over four‐jelly rolls in prismatic cells also yielded lower impacts. Thus, pointing to the importance of internal cell design when assessing environmental impacts. Finally, higher‐nickel‐content chemistries exhibit reduced climate and resource impacts due to a decreased reliance on cobalt which has higher impact during extraction and production.
Suggested Citation
Mudit Chordia & Evelina Wikner & Anders Nordelöf & Ketan Vaidya & Rickard Arvidsson, 2025.
"Linking cell design and production energy demand to estimate environmental impacts of NMC lithium‐ion batteries,"
Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 29(6), pages 2039-2052, December.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:inecol:v:29:y:2025:i:6:p:2039-2052
DOI: 10.1111/jiec.70125
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:29:y:2025:i:6:p:2039-2052. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.