Author
Abstract
The ecosystem has long served as the core metaphor in industrial ecology, shaping numerous debates throughout the discipline's history. However, other ecological metaphors can be equally productive. Before Tansley's ecosystem concept became paradigmatic in ecology, the field's most influential framework was Frederic Clements’ climax theory, which described ecological succession as a process leading toward stable, mature states. This paper proposes an alternative perspective by drawing on Clementsian succession theory to introduce industrial climax ecology, a framework that reinterprets sustainability as the pursuit of stable, utopian industrial configurations. Although Clementsian ecology has been largely superseded in ecological sciences by more mature views on succession, its foundational ideas remain relevant in conservation studies and, as argued here, can offer valuable insights for industrial ecology. The concept of industrial climax ecology provides a long‐term perspective on the kinds of economic and industrial futures humanity might envision in an era of sustainability. While Clementsian terminology requires adaptation, its vocabulary offers a conceptual bridge between scholars in the natural and social sciences. Industrial climax represents an ideal to strive for, while various proclimaxes serve as cautionary markers, highlighting suboptimal arrangements and the pitfalls of utopian thinking. By moving beyond the ecosystem metaphor and incorporating climax theory, this study calls for a historically informed, interdisciplinary approach to sustainability in industrial systems. The proposed framework encourages industrial ecologists to critically reassess how stability, resilience, and long‐term development are conceptualized, offering a broader theoretical foundation for addressing complex environmental challenges.
Suggested Citation
Marcin Krasnodębski, 2025.
"Designing utopias: Toward Clementsian industrial climax ecology,"
Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 29(6), pages 1946-1958, December.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:inecol:v:29:y:2025:i:6:p:1946-1958
DOI: 10.1111/jiec.70127
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:29:y:2025:i:6:p:1946-1958. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.