IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v29y2025i4p1223-1236.html

Risks and crisis propagation in global palladium trade network: Implications for critical resource supply chain security

Author

Listed:
  • Zhicheng Yang
  • Zhouying Song
  • Weidong Liu

Abstract

Palladium, essential in manufacturing industries and sustainable development, faces supply stability threats due to its concentrated geographical distribution and global supply–demand mismatch. This study employs complex network analysis and the cascading failure model to assess the supply chain security of the global palladium trade network during 1990–2023. The results show that the network structure is shaped by multiple factors including geopolitics, economic climates, and industrial technology. A notable decrease in the concentration of palladium supply has been observed, with higher network densities, average clustering coefficients, and shorter path lengths indicating the network's enhanced aggregation, transmission efficiency and overall resistance ability to risks. However, the recent intensification of global geopolitical situations has led to a trend of reconfiguration and isolation, progressively partitioning the network into communities of North America, Western Europe, and Russia‐East Asia, while elevating the geographical proximity as a crucial factor in trade. Despite the fact that Russia and South Africa, as major producers and suppliers of palladium, play significant roles in the spreading of supply chain crises, the central status of the network remains dominated by palladium consumers and transit countries. The risk matrix assessment demonstrates that supply risks have declined more substantially than vulnerabilities, revealing that the improvements in palladium's supply chain security are more dependent on mitigating the severity of a potential supply disruption rather than its likelihood. This study serves to integrate the dynamic perspective of crisis propagation into the evaluation of supply chain security, approaching a scenario closer to reality.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhicheng Yang & Zhouying Song & Weidong Liu, 2025. "Risks and crisis propagation in global palladium trade network: Implications for critical resource supply chain security," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 29(4), pages 1223-1236, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:29:y:2025:i:4:p:1223-1236
    DOI: 10.1111/jiec.70038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.70038
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jiec.70038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Saidani & Alissa Kendall & Bernard Yannou & Yann Leroy & François Cluzel, 2019. "Closing the loop on platinum from catalytic converters: Contributions from material flow analysis and circularity indicators," Post-Print hal-02094798, HAL.
    2. Alexander Cimprich & Vanessa Bach & Christoph Helbig & Andrea Thorenz & Dieuwertje Schrijvers & Guido Sonnemann & Steven B. Young & Thomas Sonderegger & Markus Berger, 2019. "Raw material criticality assessment as a complement to environmental life cycle assessment: Examining methods for product‐level supply risk assessment," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(5), pages 1226-1236, October.
    3. Chen, Wei & Niu, Xiaoyu & Ke, Wenqian & Yu, Zhaoyuan, 2023. "Investigating the energy trade networks in the Belt and Road regions: Structures and evolution," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    4. Chen, Wei & Dai, Yiyang & Liu, Zhigao & Zhang, Haipeng, 2024. "The evolution of global zinc trade network: Patterns and implications," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    5. Glöser, Simon & Tercero Espinoza, Luis & Gandenberger, Carsten & Faulstich, Martin, 2015. "Raw material criticality in the context of classical risk assessment," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 35-46.
    6. Roelich, Katy & Dawson, David A. & Purnell, Phil & Knoeri, Christof & Revell, Ruairi & Busch, Jonathan & Steinberger, Julia K., 2014. "Assessing the dynamic material criticality of infrastructure transitions: A case of low carbon electricity," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 378-386.
    7. Helbig, Christoph & Wietschel, Lars & Thorenz, Andrea & Tuma, Axel, 2016. "How to evaluate raw material vulnerability - An overview," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 13-24.
    8. Christoph Helbig & Martin Bruckler & Andrea Thorenz & Axel Tuma, 2021. "An Overview of Indicator Choice and Normalization in Raw Material Supply Risk Assessments," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-26, August.
    9. Leal-Ayala, David R. & Allwood, Julian M. & Petavratzi, Evi & Brown, Teresa J. & Gunn, Gus, 2015. "Mapping the global flow of tungsten to identify key material efficiency and supply security opportunities," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 19-28.
    10. Michael Saidani & Alissa Kendall & Bernard Yannou & Yann Leroy & François Cluzel, 2019. "Closing the loop on platinum from catalytic converters: Contributions from material flow analysis and circularity indicators," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(5), pages 1143-1158, October.
    11. Linqing Liu & Weiran Wang & Xiaofei Yan & Mengyun Shen & Haizhi Chen, 2023. "The cascade influence of grain trade shocks on countries in the context of the Russia-Ukraine conflict," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-28, December.
    12. Achzet, Benjamin & Helbig, Christoph, 2013. "How to evaluate raw material supply risks—an overview," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 435-447.
    13. David Laner & Helmut Rechberger & Thomas Astrup, 2015. "Applying Fuzzy and Probabilistic Uncertainty Concepts to the Material Flow Analysis of Palladium in Austria," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 19(6), pages 1055-1069, December.
    14. Tian, Xu & Geng, Yong & Sarkis, Joseph & Gao, Cuixia & Sun, Xin & Micic, Tatyana & Hao, Han & Wang, Xin, 2021. "Features of critical resource trade networks of lithium-ion batteries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    15. Kyu-Min Lee & Jae-Suk Yang & Gunn Kim & Jaesung Lee & Kwang-Il Goh & In-mook Kim, 2011. "Impact of the Topology of Global Macroeconomic Network on the Spreading of Economic Crises," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(3), pages 1-11, March.
    16. Kyu-Min Lee & Jae-Suk Yang & Gunn Kim & Jaesung Lee & Kwang-Il Goh & In-mook Kim, 2010. "Impact of the topology of global macroeconomic network on the spreading of economic crises," Papers 1011.4336, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2011.
    17. Réka Albert & Hawoong Jeong & Albert-László Barabási, 2000. "Error and attack tolerance of complex networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 406(6794), pages 378-382, July.
    18. Tokito, Shohei & Kagawa, Shigemi & Nansai, Keisuke, 2016. "Understanding international trade network complexity of platinum: The case of Japan," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 415-421.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xinxin Zheng & Huajiao Li & Xiaojie Liu & Xingxing Wang & Yuqi Zhang & Qianyong Tang & Bo Ren, 2025. "Supply risk propagation in international trade networks of the tungsten industry chain," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Daw, Georges, 2025. "Revising the ‘Economic importance’ dimension: The European framework for critical raw materials, completed and illustrated using lithium," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    3. Aiman Fadil & Paul Davis & John Geraghty, 2023. "A Mixed-Method Approach to Determine the Successful Factors Affecting the Criticality Level of Intermediate and Final Products on National Basis: A Case Study from Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-29, March.
    4. Teixeira, Bernardo & Brito, Miguel Centeno & Mateus, António, 2024. "Raw materials for the Portuguese decarbonization roadmap: The case of solar photovoltaics and wind energy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    5. Helbig, Christoph & Bradshaw, Alex M. & Kolotzek, Christoph & Thorenz, Andrea & Tuma, Axel, 2016. "Supply risks associated with CdTe and CIGS thin-film photovoltaics," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 422-433.
    6. Bucciarelli, Pauline & Hache, Emmanuel & Mignon, Valérie, 2025. "Evaluating criticality of strategic metals: Are the Herfindahl–Hirschman Index and usual concentration thresholds still relevant?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    7. Keisuke Nansai & Kenichi Nakajima & Sangwon Suh & Shigemi Kagawa & Yasushi Kondo & Wataru Takayanagi & Yosuke Shigetomi, 2017. "The role of primary processing in the supply risks of critical metals," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 335-356, July.
    8. Luca Ciacci & Philip Nuss & Barbara K. Reck & T. T. Werner & T. E. Graedel, 2016. "Metal Criticality Determination for Australia, the US, and the Planet—Comparing 2008 and 2012 Results," Resources, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-8, September.
    9. Masoudi, S.M. & Ezzati, E. & Rashidnejad-Omran, N. & Moradzadeh, Ali, 2017. "Geoeconomics of fluorspar as strategic and critical mineral in Iran," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 100-106.
    10. Yan, Jingjing & Guo, Yaoqi & Zhang, Hongwei, 2024. "The dynamic evolution mechanism of structural dependence characteristics in the global oil trade network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    11. Marie K. Schellens & Johanna Gisladottir, 2018. "Critical Natural Resources: Challenging the Current Discourse and Proposal for a Holistic Definition," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-28, December.
    12. Kang, Xinyu & Wang, Minxi & Chen, Lu & Li, Xin, 2023. "Supply risk propagation of global copper industry chain based on multi-layer complex network," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    13. Bach, Vanessa & Finogenova, Natalia & Berger, Markus & Winter, Lisa & Finkbeiner, Matthias, 2017. "Enhancing the assessment of critical resource use at the country level with the SCARCE method – Case study of Germany," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 283-299.
    14. Simon Glöser-Chahoud & Luis Tercero Espinoza & Rainer Walz & Martin Faulstich, 2016. "Taking the Step towards a More Dynamic View on Raw Material Criticality: An Indicator Based Analysis for Germany and Japan," Resources, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Jasiński, Dominik & Cinelli, Marco & Dias, Luis C. & Meredith, James & Kirwan, Kerry, 2018. "Assessing supply risks for non-fossil mineral resources via multi-criteria decision analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 150-158.
    16. Dewulf, Jo & Blengini, Gian Andrea & Pennington, David & Nuss, Philip & Nassar, Nedal T., 2016. "Criticality on the international scene: Quo vadis?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 169-176.
    17. Lauren MacDonald & Dandan Zhang & Aydın Alptekinoğlu & Athanasios K. Karamalidis, 2025. "Enhancing the Resilience of Platinum Group Metal Supply Chains: Mine to (Re)use," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(5), pages 7069-7085, October.
    18. Gerald Feichtinger & Wolfgang Posch, 2025. "Evaluation of European Critical Raw Material Assessments under Energy Transition Considerations: Applications and Prospects," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 2057-2131, June.
    19. Pell, Robert S. & Wall, Frances & Yan, Xiaoyu & Bailey, Gwendolyn, 2019. "Applying and advancing the economic resource scarcity potential (ESP) method for rare earth elements," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 472-481.
    20. Yu, Shiwei & Duan, Haoran & Cheng, Jinhua, 2021. "An evaluation of the supply risk for China's strategic metallic mineral resources," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:29:y:2025:i:4:p:1223-1236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.