Author
Listed:
- Jun Hong Clarence Ng
- Pradeep Vyawahare
- Pahola Thathiana Benavides
- Yu Gan
- Pingping Sun
- Richard Boardman
- Jason Marcinkoski
- Amgad Elgowainy
Abstract
Under the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, tax credits of up to $3/kgH2 are available to hydrogen producers if they generate emissions at levels below 0.45 kgCO2e/kgH2, spurring producers to explore how hydrogen production via electrolysis using electricity generated by nuclear power may qualify for such tax credits. With uranium as a primary fuel for nuclear power plants (NPPs) and no on‐site emissions, the upstream emissions associated with nuclear fuel supply chains largely determine the carbon intensity of nuclear energy. Using the GREET (Greenhouse gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy use in Technologies) model, we evaluated the life‐cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of uranium production and the use of uranium to generate electricity in light water reactor (LWR) NPPs. We evaluated the process chemicals and energy inputs throughout the nuclear fuel supply chain to identify the major contributors to nuclear fuel cycle GHG emissions. Such emissions are estimated at 3.0 gCO2e/kWh at NPPs in the United States. The greatest share of nuclear fuel cycle GHG emissions—comprising 53% of total emissions—are associated with electricity consumption throughout the fuel supply chain. We extended the analysis to include an evaluation of the carbon intensity of H2 production via electrolysis using nuclear power from LWRs. Finally, we examined the impact of future (2035 and 2050) electricity supply chain scenarios on nuclear fuel cycle GHG emissions. Our analysis revealed a decrease of 33% (2035) and 46% (2050) in the carbon intensity of nuclear electricity relative to current nuclear fuel cycle GHG emissions.
Suggested Citation
Jun Hong Clarence Ng & Pradeep Vyawahare & Pahola Thathiana Benavides & Yu Gan & Pingping Sun & Richard Boardman & Jason Marcinkoski & Amgad Elgowainy, 2025.
"Life‐cycle greenhouse gas emissions associated with nuclear power generation in the United States,"
Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 29(3), pages 719-732, June.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:inecol:v:29:y:2025:i:3:p:719-732
DOI: 10.1111/jiec.70008
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:29:y:2025:i:3:p:719-732. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.