IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v29y2025i3p683-697.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accounting for learning in prospective LCA: Theory and practical guidance

Author

Listed:
  • Sander S. van Nielen
  • René Kleijn
  • Arnold Tukker

Abstract

Learning is important for the development of industrially deployed technologies, and learning curves have been used to determine future production costs. Although the effect of learning on costs has been extensively studied, little evidence exists for its effect on environmental impacts, and a conceptual underpinning is lacking. Based on a review of theoretical foundations and empirical evidence, this study presents a procedure for assessing learning of industrial processes in ex ante and prospective life cycle assessment (LCA). We argue that learning involves operational or organizational changes, which are motivated by incentives. Therefore, environmental impacts may follow a learning curve trend if the origins of impacts coincide with dominant incentives. A key observation is that the results may vary by impact category, and certain impacts may not decline at all. Therefore, we developed guidelines that consider these differences when evaluating environmental learning effects and rates, as illustrated with examples in an LCA context. Further research is needed to expand the evidence base for environmental learning, by re‐interpreting datasets of existing technologies to determine their learning rates.

Suggested Citation

  • Sander S. van Nielen & René Kleijn & Arnold Tukker, 2025. "Accounting for learning in prospective LCA: Theory and practical guidance," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 29(3), pages 683-697, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:29:y:2025:i:3:p:683-697
    DOI: 10.1111/jiec.70002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.70002
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jiec.70002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:29:y:2025:i:3:p:683-697. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.