IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v22y2018i2p356-368.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Waste Footprint of French Households in 2020: A Comparison of Scenarios of Consumption Growth Using Input†Output Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Antoine Beylot
  • Baptiste Boitier
  • Nicolas Lancesseur
  • Jacques Villeneuve

Abstract

This study aims at quantifying and analyzing the waste footprint of French household consumption in 2020 with respect to different scenarios of economic growth. Three models are jointly used: (1) a multiregional unilateral input†output model extended to waste, to quantify waste generation from economic activities induced by household consumption; (2) a coefficient†based model dedicated to quantifying postconsumer waste as a function of household consumption; and (3) the New Econometric Model of Evaluation by Sectorial Interdependency and Supply (NEMESIS), a macroeconometric model used to elaborate different scenarios of growth in household consumption in the period 2008–2020. Three scenarios consider changes primarily in terms of household consumption volume, while one scenario additionally considers changes in the composition of consumption according to the past†30†year trend. First, this study suggests that if the trend in changes of composition is maintained, it will lead, by 2020, to a “relative†decoupling between French household consumption and waste footprint with respect to dry recyclables, mixed wastes, and organic wastes and to an “absolute†decoupling with respect to mineral wastes. Second, this study provides a mapping of the changes in French household waste footprints from 2008 to 2020 as a function of scenarios, with indications of where these changes would actually occur in the economy (waste from economic activities or postconsumer waste) and geographically (in France or abroad). In particular, for most of the scenarios considered, changes in French household consumption from 2008 to 2020 primarily induce changes in organic and mineral waste generation abroad rather than in France.

Suggested Citation

  • Antoine Beylot & Baptiste Boitier & Nicolas Lancesseur & Jacques Villeneuve, 2018. "The Waste Footprint of French Households in 2020: A Comparison of Scenarios of Consumption Growth Using Input†Output Analysis," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(2), pages 356-368, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:22:y:2018:i:2:p:356-368
    DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12566
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12566
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jiec.12566?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Edgar Battand Towa Kouokam & Vanessa Zeller & Stefano Merciai & Wouter Achten, 2021. "Regional waste footprint and waste treatments analysis," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/332189, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    2. Chaojie Yu & Junqing Xu & Aihua Zhao & Peiyuan Xiao & Jun Tai & Zhujie Bi & Guangming Li, 2022. "The Generation and Effects for Recyclable Waste from Households in a Megapolis: A Case Study in Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-14, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:22:y:2018:i:2:p:356-368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.