IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v1y1997i2p33-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clean Recycling of Lead‐Acid Batteries for Electric Vehicles: A Reply to Socolow and Thomas

Author

Listed:
  • Lester B. Lave
  • Chris T. Hendrickson
  • Francis C. McMichael

Abstract

This article is stimulated by the analysis of Socolow and Thomas in the first issue of this journal. Our work showed that a lead‐acid battery‐powered electric vehicle (Ev) would result in more lead being discharged into the environment than a comparable car burning leaded gasoline. Five hundred thousand EVs would lead to a 20% increase in lead use in the United States, and presumably a comparable 20% increase in lead discharges. The Socolow‐Thomas analysis asserts: (I) choosing not to pursue technology that uses toxic materials will unduly constrain the research and development (R&D) in advanced vehicles and limit the options likely to emerge from that research; (2) we do not do a full risk assessment of the lead discharges from lead smelting, battery making and recycling; and (3) in response to regulation the industry might devise a “clean recycling” system. We doubt the wisdom of increasing R&D on lead batteries because introducing large quantities of lead into cars will pose health risks. The possibility of clean recycling in the future is not an adequate basis for mandating EVs. Proponents of EVs should prove there is no harm to the environment Regulators should not require EVs until there is a reasonable showing of environmental benefit and that the requirement is cost‐effective in reducing ozone.

Suggested Citation

  • Lester B. Lave & Chris T. Hendrickson & Francis C. McMichael, 1997. "Clean Recycling of Lead‐Acid Batteries for Electric Vehicles: A Reply to Socolow and Thomas," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 1(2), pages 33-37, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:1:y:1997:i:2:p:33-37
    DOI: 10.1162/jiec.1997.1.2.33
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/jiec.1997.1.2.33
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/jiec.1997.1.2.33?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:1:y:1997:i:2:p:33-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.