IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v17y2013i3p363-374.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life Cycle Assessment Model for the Use of Alternative Resources in Ironmaking

Author

Listed:
  • Carl O. Vadenbo
  • Michael E. Boesch
  • Stefanie Hellweg

Abstract

The iron and steel industry represents an important case for industrial ecology due to its ability to accept waste‐derived inputs and due to the generation of useful by‐products. With the objective of supporting environmentally conscious decisions regarding resource use and waste management, a life cycle assessment (LCA) tool for ironmaking was developed. The tool combines mass flow‐based process models with an LCA database to assess the use of alternative resources in ironmaking, considering various process configurations. The article contains a description of the tool and a case study illustrating two areas of application. In the first part of the case study, an inventory analysis focused on the effects of feedstock recycling of waste plastics in ironmaking on heavy metal distribution is presented. It is demonstrated how uncertainties in input heavy metal concentrations and mass transfer can be incorporated into the model to predict the heavy metal loads in the process outputs. In the second part, the substitution of coke with a range of alternative reducing agents are assessed with regard to impact on climate change and fossil resource depletion. It was found that the use of sustainably sourced charcoal and waste‐derived reducing agents is beneficial both with respect to the impact on climate change and fossil resource depletion at the respective calculated coke replacement ratio, whereas the results for heavy oil, coke oven gas, and raw tar indicate that trade‐offs between impact categories occur. The results also highlight the importance of considering the avoided impacts of alternative treatments for waste‐derived resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Carl O. Vadenbo & Michael E. Boesch & Stefanie Hellweg, 2013. "Life Cycle Assessment Model for the Use of Alternative Resources in Ironmaking," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 17(3), pages 363-374, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:17:y:2013:i:3:p:363-374
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00543.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00543.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00543.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Magdalena Klotz & Melanie Haupt & Stefanie Hellweg, 2023. "Potentials and limits of mechanical plastic recycling," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(4), pages 1043-1059, August.
    2. Fengjiao Ma & A. Egrinya Eneji & Yanbin Wu, 2018. "An Evaluation of Input–Output Value for Sustainability in a Chinese Steel Production System Based on Emergy Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Vadenbo, Carl & Hellweg, Stefanie & Guillén-Gosálbez, Gonzalo, 2014. "Multi-objective optimization of waste and resource management in industrial networks – Part I: Model description," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 52-63.
    4. Wang, Chunyan & Wang, Ranran & Hertwich, Edgar & Liu, Yi, 2017. "A technology-based analysis of the water-energy-emission nexus of China’s steel industry," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 116-128.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:17:y:2013:i:3:p:363-374. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.