IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijurrs/v50y2026i4p960-981.html

ORCHESTRATING DIFFERENCE AND SIMILARITY: Black Fungibility, and the Spatial Redrawing of Racial Categories in Spanish Colonial Morocco, Sahara and Guinea

Author

Listed:
  • Pol Fité Matamoros

Abstract

In this article I dissect the spatial strategies through which the Spanish attempted to orchestrate both racial difference and similarity in the African colonies of Morocco, Western Sahara and Equatorial Guinea during the first half of the twentieth century. With the ‘loss’ of its last American colonies, and increasingly positioned as the internal ‘other’ of Europe, the Spanish sought to build a new Ibero‐African empire and leverage their historical, geographical and racial ties to northwest Africa through the built environment to justify colonial rule and accrue political capital. Yet Spain’s colonial geographical project required Black fungibility both as its raw material—enabling those new colonial landscapes, real or imagined—and as a limit category that could be occupied by any/body. Drawing from both primary archival materials and a host of secondary sources, I show how space—broadly understood as geographic imaginations, architectural styles, urban designs and the uses and policing of public places—became key to orchestrating such similarities and differences, capitalizing on the fluidity of racial categories and securing the supremacy of a struggling Spanish colonizer.

Suggested Citation

  • Pol Fité Matamoros, 2026. "ORCHESTRATING DIFFERENCE AND SIMILARITY: Black Fungibility, and the Spatial Redrawing of Racial Categories in Spanish Colonial Morocco, Sahara and Guinea," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(4), pages 960-981, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:50:y:2026:i:4:p:960-981
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.70049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.70049
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-2427.70049?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:50:y:2026:i:4:p:960-981. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-1317 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.