IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijurrs/v50y2026i4p877-896.html

CHINESE UNIVERSITIES AS URBAN DEVELOPERS: The Tale of Two Innovation Complexes in Nanjing, China

Author

Listed:
  • Hao Chen
  • Yunpeng Zhang

Abstract

Chinese universities are important but undertheorized players in the production of urban built environments. Most work focuses on purpose‐built university towns, neglecting the redevelopment of underutilized downtown campuses. Therefore, this article considers how two publicly funded universities in Nanjing attempted to establish ‘innovation complexes’ in their older, poorly maintained urban campuses. These two real estate developments were legitimized by promises of technological innovation that would spearhead China’s transition to an innovation‐driven economy. They accommodated both universities’ evolving spatial needs and revived underutilized spaces for more ‘productive’ purposes. Both universities worked with local government and external actors to develop their innovation complexes. However, their different academic strengths, prior experience with knowledge valorization and place histories affected the resulting partnerships and led to divergent outcomes. This comparison underscores the breadth of university real estate practices, evolving town–gown relationships, and the politics of urban regeneration, as China seeks to replace economic growth driven by land development with an innovation‐driven economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Hao Chen & Yunpeng Zhang, 2026. "CHINESE UNIVERSITIES AS URBAN DEVELOPERS: The Tale of Two Innovation Complexes in Nanjing, China," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(4), pages 877-896, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:50:y:2026:i:4:p:877-896
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.70053
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.70053
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-2427.70053?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:50:y:2026:i:4:p:877-896. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-1317 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.