Author
Listed:
- Luquan Liang
- Jennifer Day
- Sun Sheng Han
Abstract
The global governance of urban greenspaces increasingly recognizes the importance of citizen and NGO involvement, since top‐down management often fails to address non‐governmental stakeholders’ diverse perceptions, preferences and demands. Research on public service co‐production and environmental stewardship emphasizes the role of internal and extrinsic motivations in facilitating co‐production, but overlooks value‐driven and organizational motivations. This article explores why and how citizens and NGOs develop a sense of commonality and co‐produce urban greenspaces. Data were gathered through in‐depth interviews with engaged citizens, NGOs and government representatives in Beijing, China. The findings reveal that NGOs and citizens were motivated by the interplay of value‐based and agency‐based factors. Altruistic and biospheric values, attachments to greenspaces and a sense of responsibility enhanced the perceived salience of these issues and motivated citizens and NGOs to co‐produce. In addition, NGOs viewed co‐production as a strategy to achieve environmental management goals requiring government support and agreement. Low efficacy did not deter participation; instead, citizens and NGOs sought greater resources, power and influence in decision‐making related to greenspace planning and management through co‐production. These findings suggest that policy innovations should foster environmental values and a sense of responsibility, empower citizens to increase efficacy, and integrate environmentally‐oriented perspectives into greenspace planning and management.
Suggested Citation
Luquan Liang & Jennifer Day & Sun Sheng Han, 2026.
"MOTIVATIONS OF CITIZENS AND ENVIRONMENTAL NGOS: Co‐Producing Urban Greenspaces in Beijing,"
International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 221-239, January.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:50:y:2026:i:1:p:221-239
DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.70028
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:50:y:2026:i:1:p:221-239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-1317 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.