IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijurrs/v49y2025i5p1129-1145.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

NEGOTIATING A CULTURAL ORDER FOR THE URBAN SPACE: The European Capital of Culture Initiative as a Boundary Object Mobilized by Radical‐Right Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Lamour

Abstract

The radical right in Europe is engaged in a political and cultural battle against the liberal principles defining the European Union. Nevertheless, it has to interact with liberal EU institutions to implement European policies when it controls public executives. This relationship has given rise to a limited amount of research when the issue at stake is the implementation of EU‐coordinated urban policies. The scope of the current article is to investigate the phenomenon by considering the preselection and selection processes of Hungarian cities controlled by the Fidesz party competing for the 2023 European Capital of Culture title. The analysis shows that these cities and the selection panel assessing their candidacies were negotiating a cultural order for urban Hungary. This negotiation was based on a logic of ambivalence and avoidance by interacting stakeholders to ensure the selection process reached its terms as contemplated by EU regulations. The concept of a ‘boundary object’ defined in interactionist studies is used to approach how the European Capital of Culture initiative was mobilized by the radical right to secure its acceptance in the liberal EU, in spite of its political agenda being aimed at destroying the liberal EU.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Lamour, 2025. "NEGOTIATING A CULTURAL ORDER FOR THE URBAN SPACE: The European Capital of Culture Initiative as a Boundary Object Mobilized by Radical‐Right Cities," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(5), pages 1129-1145, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:49:y:2025:i:5:p:1129-1145
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.13343
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.13343
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-2427.13343?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:49:y:2025:i:5:p:1129-1145. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-1317 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.