IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijurrs/v49y2025i4p798-814.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

URBAN AGRICULTURE IN NEO‐AUSTERITY TIMES: Reflections on a Contested Policy Domain

Author

Listed:
  • António Ferreira
  • Ana MÉLICE DIAS
  • Miguel Lopes

Abstract

Urban agriculture (UA) initiatives have become a key area of research, policymaking and activism in reaction to the dominance of global for‐profit supply chains that have introduced significant food‐related vulnerabilities in urban areas. However, empirical evidence shows that UA initiatives encounter powerful implementation barriers imposed by the neoliberal powers that have established such supply chains. This article proposes that ‘neo‐austerity urbanism’ has become a relevant political strategy that supports such barriers. It considers the case of Lisbon and is informed by an interview‐based inquiry aimed at identifying the implementation barriers blocking the development of transformative UA initiatives in this city while making such initiatives an integral part of neo‐austerity urbanism. Three types of barriers were identified: those derived from the envisioned urban realm; the governance system in place; and the urban agriculture model envisioned. Together, these barriers form an effective mechanism to suppress urban agriculture as an activity with transformative potential in social, environmental and economic terms.

Suggested Citation

  • António Ferreira & Ana MÉLICE DIAS & Miguel Lopes, 2025. "URBAN AGRICULTURE IN NEO‐AUSTERITY TIMES: Reflections on a Contested Policy Domain," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(4), pages 798-814, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:49:y:2025:i:4:p:798-814
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.13314
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.13314
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-2427.13314?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:49:y:2025:i:4:p:798-814. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-1317 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.