IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijurrs/v49y2025i3p569-586.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

THE DENSITY DIALECTIC: Between Hard and Gentle Densification in London

Author

Listed:
  • Victoria Habermehl
  • Colin McFarlane

Abstract

Density is critical to cities, but how might we conceive and research its role in urban development? We argue that a conceptualization of the ‘density dialectic’ offers a productive response. Drawing on research on urban development in Tower Hamlets (London's densest borough), we identify the tensions and contradictions of current densification approaches. A dialectical approach illuminates those tensions, examines the range of actors, processes and social, economic and environmental concerns that become enrolled, and identifies how densification operates to accommodate its changing relations and contradictions. In a context of rapid and intense urban development, we draw on interviews with planners to show how ‘gentle’ and ‘hard’ visions of density connect, conflate and collide as the borough looks to meet challenging housing targets alongside social and environmental objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Victoria Habermehl & Colin McFarlane, 2025. "THE DENSITY DIALECTIC: Between Hard and Gentle Densification in London," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(3), pages 569-586, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:49:y:2025:i:3:p:569-586
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.13319
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.13319
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-2427.13319?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:49:y:2025:i:3:p:569-586. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-1317 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.