IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijurrs/v47y2023i5p710-724.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vertical Geographies, Polyvocality And The Everyday In A Divided City

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Aceska

Abstract

The vertical turn in urban scholarship is a critique of the overly horizontal perspectives used in studying cities in academic research. This article broadens this scholarship by engaging with the ways that horizontal perspectives on urban conditions dominate not only scholarly perspectives but also professional responses to urban change. By drawing on research in the divided city of Mostar in Bosnia and Herzegovina, it argues for a ‘polyvocal’ approach to studying professional responses to urban conditions, one that facilitates a productive juxtaposition of those responses with city dwellers’ everyday engagements with the vertical qualities of the built environment. It also seeks to understand how vertical geographies—here, tall landmarks—in divided cities are seen as part of the complex urban realities of city dwellers in strategies of urban planning and heritage‐making related to postwar reconciliation. These findings are compared with ethnographic data about how people make sense of tall landmarks in divided cities and how they experience and interpret them in relation to senses of togetherness and belonging to divided cities. By putting these two lines of research in a dialogue, the ‘polyvocal' approach offers a way to rethink conventional strategies of urban reconciliation and taken‐for‐granted ways of conceptualizing cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Aceska, 2023. "Vertical Geographies, Polyvocality And The Everyday In A Divided City," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(5), pages 710-724, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:47:y:2023:i:5:p:710-724
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.13169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.13169
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-2427.13169?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher Harker, 2014. "The Only Way Is Up? Ordinary Topologies of Ramallah," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 318-335, January.
    2. Anita Bakshi, 2014. "Urban Form and Memory Discourses: Spatial Practices in Contested Cities," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 189-210, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Çağla Beyaz & Çilen Erçin, 2023. "Evaluation of Modern Architecture Criteria in the Context of Sustainability and Architectural Approach; Modern Period in North Nicosia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-48, June.
    2. Zugayar, Maliha & Avni, Nufar & Silverman, Emily, 2021. "Vertical informality: The case of Kufr Aqab in East Jerusalem," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    3. Efrat Eizenberg & Orly Sasson & Mor Shilon, 2019. "Urban Morphology and Qualitative Topology: Open Green Spaces in High-Rise Residential Developments," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(4), pages 73-85.
    4. Richard Baxter, 2017. "The High-Rise Home: Verticality as Practice in London," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 334-352, March.
    5. Megan Nethercote & Ralph Horne, 2016. "Ordinary vertical urbanisms: City apartments and the everyday geographies of high-rise families," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(8), pages 1581-1598, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:47:y:2023:i:5:p:710-724. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-1317 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.