IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijurrs/v27y2003i2p455-459.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Le Pen's comeback: the 2002 French presidential election

Author

Listed:
  • Nonna Mayer

Abstract

How could the French far right draw nearly 20% of the valid votes in the first round of the 2002 presidential election? Who are these voters and have they changed? Can this happen again? To answer these questions we rely on a three wave panel survey of 10,000 interviews conducted before the first round of the presidential election, after the second round and after the second round of the parliamentary elections. It shows that the main features of the Le Pen vote – xenophobic, authoritarian, mostly male – have not changed. But there has been an important shift in its social bases, from urban to rural areas and from young to elderly voters. Comment l'extrême droite française a‐t‐elle pu attirer près de 20% des suffrages exprimés au premier tour des élections présidentielles de 2002? Qui est son électorat et a‐t‐il évolué? Est‐ce que cela peut se reproduire? Pour répondre à ces questions, l'article s'appuie sur une étude par panel en trois temps comptant 10,000 entretiens menés avant le premier tour de l'élection présidentielle, après le second tour, puis après le deuxième tour des élections parlementaires. Elle montre que les principales caractéristiques de l'électorat de Le Pen – xénophobe, partisan de l'autorité, en majorité masculin – n'a pas changé. Toutefois, il s'est produit un décalage important de ses bases sociales, des zones urbaines aux zones rurales, et des jeunes vers les personnes âgées.

Suggested Citation

  • Nonna Mayer, 2003. "Le Pen's comeback: the 2002 French presidential election," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(2), pages 455-459, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:27:y:2003:i:2:p:455-459
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.00458
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00458
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-2427.00458?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:27:y:2003:i:2:p:455-459. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-1317 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.