IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijurrs/v26y2002i1p121-137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deterritorialization and Reterritorialization of the Orisha Religion in Africa and the New World (Nigeria, Cuba and the United States)

Author

Listed:
  • Erwan Dianteill

Abstract

This article deals with the relationship of religion to space, ethnicity and political domination, through the case of the Orisha religion in Africa and the Americas. This religion originated in the south‐east of present‐day Nigeria and was first re‐implanted in the Americas as a result of the deportation of thousands of Yoruba slaves, especially to Cuba. Today, it is experiencing a second transplantation, resulting from Cuban emigration, mainly to the United States. These two moves, from Africa to Cuba and then from Cuba to the United States, have been associated with successive processes of territorialization and dissemination in very different social and political contexts, which are analysed in historical sequence. On each occasion, transmission through lineage and dissemination through proximity seem to have come into play, in varying degrees according to the socio‐political context. Even though religion and ethnic identity were closely linked in Africa, the Orisha religion has spread into populations of European and mixed‐race origin in Cuba. The United States is witnessing a form of ‘re‐ethnicization’ of this religion in the black population and in the Hispanic population, with notable differences between the East Coast and California. Cet article a pour objet le rapport de la religion à l’espace, à l’ethnicité et à la domination politique dans le cas de la religion des orisha en Afrique et dans les Amériques. Cette religion, originaire du sud‐ouest de l’actuel Nigeria, s’est d’abord réimplantée dans les Amériques du fait de la déportation de milliers d’esclaves yoruba, à Cuba en particulier. Elle connaît aujourd’hui une seconde transplantation du fait de l’émigration cubaine, aux Etats‐Unis principalement. Les deux déplacements, de l’Afrique vers Cuba puis de Cuba vers les Etats‐Unis, sont associés à des processus successifs de territorialisation et de diffusion dans des contextes sociaux et politiques très différents, qui sont analysés dans leur succession historique. A chaque moment historique, il apparaît que transmission lignagère et diffusion par proximité jouent à des degrés variables selon les contextes socio‐politiques. Alors que religion et identité ethnique étaient étroitement liés en Afrique, la religion des orisha s’est diffusée dans la population d’origine européenne et métisse à Cuba. Aux Etats‐Unis, on assiste à une forme de ‘ré‐ethnicisation’ de cette religion dans la population noire et dans la population hispanique, avec des différences notables entre la côte Est et la Californie.

Suggested Citation

  • Erwan Dianteill, 2002. "Deterritorialization and Reterritorialization of the Orisha Religion in Africa and the New World (Nigeria, Cuba and the United States)," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 121-137, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:26:y:2002:i:1:p:121-137
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.00367
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00367
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-2427.00367?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marleen De Witte, 2008. "Accra's Sounds and Sacred Spaces," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 690-709, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:26:y:2002:i:1:p:121-137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-1317 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.