IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijurrs/v21y1997i2p165-179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Space Traders: Reregulation, Property Companies and Auckland's Office Market, 1975–94

Author

Listed:
  • Zoltan Moricz
  • Laurence Murphy

Abstract

The global property boom of the 1980s and its aftermath has prompted considerable debate among academics. For the most part research has been directed toward the global cities of London, New York and Tokyo. Notwithstanding the significance of property processes within these global cities, metropolitan areas outside of the core financial centres have also experienced major transformations in their property markets. This paper examines the character of Auckland's speculative office property boom of the 1980s which resulted in a level of output comparable to global cities such as Paris and Frankfurt. We argue that the wholesale reregulation of the New Zealand economy in the 1980s, and in particular the liberalization of financial markets and the share market, provided a context in which the structure of agents associated with the provision of office space was radically altered. The rise of property companies, and their dominance of the development process throughout the boom and subsequent crash, is detailed. Whilst Auckland's property boom conforms to the global experience, we argue that the specific character and intensity of the development process in Auckland highlights the need to appreciate the ‘particularity of place’.

Suggested Citation

  • Zoltan Moricz & Laurence Murphy, 1997. "Space Traders: Reregulation, Property Companies and Auckland's Office Market, 1975–94," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(2), pages 165-179, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:21:y:1997:i:2:p:165-179
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.00067
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00067
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-2427.00067?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:21:y:1997:i:2:p:165-179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-1317 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.