Author
Abstract
This study examines the optometric research landscape in three East Asian countries—China, Japan, and Korea—analysing how research trends align with each country's national health strategies. By evaluating published articles and reviews from national journals between 2006 March 2025, we identify key areas of focus, including paediatric optometry, refractive errors, and advanced diagnostic techniques. China's research emphasises pathogenesis and retinal diseases, driven by its aging population and high prevalence of chronic conditions, while Japan prioritises binocular vision and professional practice across all age groups. Korea focuses on accommodation, contact lenses, and the impact of digital technology on vision, reflecting its high prevalence of myopia among children. These variations are shaped by demographic trends and public health strategies. China's targeted health policy, the “China Five‐Year National Plan for Eye Health 2016–2020,” has directly influenced domestic research, particularly in artificial intelligence and diagnostics. In contrast, Japan's “Vision Health Care 2035” and Korea's “National Health Plan 2030” have had a more limited effect on shaping optometry research, with trends driven more by societal needs—such as Japan's aging population and Korea's focus on children's digital device use. The findings highlight how China's policy‐driven approach directly influences research priorities, while in Japan and Korea, research responds more to demographic shifts. This comparative analysis underscores the importance of targeted national policies in advancing healthcare innovation and shaping research directions in optometry. This study offers actionable insight into how targeted health policies, demographic transitions, and clinical practice models shape national optometric research agendas, providing a framework for aligning future research with healthcare goals.
Suggested Citation
Jihye Ahn & Moonsung Choi, 2026.
"Driving Innovation: The Impact of National Health Policies on Optometry Research in East Asia,"
International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(1), pages 37-46, January.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:41:y:2026:i:1:p:37-46
DOI: 10.1002/hpm.70023
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:41:y:2026:i:1:p:37-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.