IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v41y2026i1p204-213.html

Implementing the Oxford House Model in Bulgaria: Challenges Faced and Lessons Learnt

Author

Listed:
  • Ronald Harvey
  • Ivan Ivanov

Abstract

Oxford Houses (OH) are a widely adopted model of self‐run aftercare settings originally established in the United States for people in recovery from substance use disorders (SUDs). However, OHs have had relatively limited success being established outside of the U.S. This article represents first person accounts of two multi‐year collaborations to implement the OH model in Varna, Bulgaria in 2016–2017 and 2020–2023. This article describes the origins of the projects, basic steps in creating these OHs, and what was learnt from our collaborations' successes and challenges. A total of 11 Bulgarian male volunteers in recovery from SUDs lived in these two OHs. Both efforts demonstrated the OH model was difficult to sustain and may not be replicable in Bulgaria for two reasons: the common problem of attrition and low interpersonal trust presented a barrier to recruiting potential new residents who did not want to live with people they did not know, and a nascent recovery culture resulting in low levels of recovery capital. These accounts offer an analysis of the barriers to creating sustainable OHs in Bulgaria and perhaps in other cultural contexts outside the United States.

Suggested Citation

  • Ronald Harvey & Ivan Ivanov, 2026. "Implementing the Oxford House Model in Bulgaria: Challenges Faced and Lessons Learnt," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(1), pages 204-213, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:41:y:2026:i:1:p:204-213
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.70043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.70043
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.70043?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:41:y:2026:i:1:p:204-213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.