IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v41y2026i1p132-155.html

Intermediaries and Development of Biopharmaceuticals: Evidence From the Innovation Policy in a Developing Country

Author

Listed:
  • Atiyeh Safardoust
  • Fereidoun Mahboudi
  • Soode Mirmohammadi
  • Mohsen Pourqasem

Abstract

Motivation The biopharmaceutical industry in Iran has made significant progress in recent years, supported by multiple innovation policies aimed at its development. Nevertheless, challenges such as limited resources, skill and managerial gaps, weak networking, and restricted access to funding and incentives have hindered sustainable innovation. Purpose This study aims to examine the role of intermediaries in supporting biopharmaceutical companies and to analyze how innovation policies influence technological capabilities, networking, human capital development, and access to funding and incentives in Iran. Approach and Methods A qualitative approach was employed, using purposive sampling to select 19 participants from the governmental, academic, and industrial sectors. Data were collected through semi‐structured interviews and analyzed using Braun and Clarke's six‐step thematic analysis (2006). Data credibility and validity were ensured through member checking, triangulation, and independent coding by two researchers. Findings The findings indicate that innovation policies have advanced across four main dimensions—exploitation of results and production, networking and facilitation, human capital, and funding and incentives—but each dimension faces specific challenges. Intermediaries, including accelerators, technology centers, industry associations, and specialized investment funds, play a key role in addressing these challenges by providing practical training, financial and technical support, facilitating cross‐sector collaborations, and establishing professional networks, thereby fostering sustainable development and innovation in the biopharmaceutical sector. Policy Implications Strengthening intermediaries and implementing targeted policies based on companies' real needs can enhance the effectiveness of innovation policies, reduce import dependence, and improve the global competitiveness of Iran's biopharmaceutical industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Atiyeh Safardoust & Fereidoun Mahboudi & Soode Mirmohammadi & Mohsen Pourqasem, 2026. "Intermediaries and Development of Biopharmaceuticals: Evidence From the Innovation Policy in a Developing Country," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(1), pages 132-155, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:41:y:2026:i:1:p:132-155
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.70034
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.70034
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.70034?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Czarnitzki, Dirk & Lopes-Bento, Cindy, 2013. "Value for money? New microeconometric evidence on public R&D grants in Flanders," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 76-89.
    2. Kerong Zhang & Wuyi Liu, 2020. "The Current Status, Trend, and Development Strategies of Chinese Biopharmaceutical Industry With a Challenging Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440209, January.
    3. Caroline Paunov, 2013. "Innovation and Inclusive Development: A Discussion of the Main Policy Issues," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2013/1, OECD Publishing.
    4. Magro, Edurne & Wilson, James R., 2013. "Complex innovation policy systems: Towards an evaluation mix," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(9), pages 1647-1656.
    5. Adrian, Tobias & Song Shin, Hyun, 2010. "Financial Intermediaries and Monetary Economics," Handbook of Monetary Economics, in: Benjamin M. Friedman & Michael Woodford (ed.), Handbook of Monetary Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 12, pages 601-650, Elsevier.
    6. Ali Mohammad Meysami & Reza Naghizadeh & Jafar Heydari & Joao Ferreira, 2023. "A Model of Effective Factors for Sustainable Growth of New Technology-Based Firms in Developing Countries," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(4), pages 4630-4656, December.
    7. Howells, Jeremy, 2006. "Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 715-728, June.
    8. Martin, Stephen & Scott, John T., 2000. "The nature of innovation market failure and the design of public support for private innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(4-5), pages 437-447, April.
    9. Watkins, Andrew & Papaioannou, Theo & Mugwagwa, Julius & Kale, Dinar, 2015. "National innovation systems and the intermediary role of industry associations in building institutional capacities for innovation in developing countries: A critical review of the literature," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(8), pages 1407-1418.
    10. Kivimaa, Paula, 2014. "Government-affiliated intermediary organisations as actors in system-level transitions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(8), pages 1370-1380.
    11. Xiao Xiao & Yue Cheng & Yuling Zhang, 2024. "Sustainable Innovation in the Biopharmaceutical Industry: An Analysis of the Impact of Policy Configuration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-23, March.
    12. Albert N. Link & John T. Scott, 2013. "Governments as entrepreneur: Evaluating the commercialization success of SBIR projects," Chapters, in: Public Support of Innovation in Entrepreneurial Firms, chapter 2, pages 25-38, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Edler, Jakob & Yeow, Jillian, 2016. "Connecting demand and supply: The role of intermediation in public procurement of innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 414-426.
    14. Margherita Russo & Annalisa Caloffi & Federica Rossi & Riccardo Righi, 2019. "Innovation intermediaries and performance-based incentives: A case study of regional innovation poles," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 46(1), pages 1-12.
    15. Babke N. Hogenhuis & Ellis A. Van Den Hende & Erik Jan Hultink, 2017. "Unlocking The Innovation Potential In Large Firms Through Timely And Meaningful Interactions With Young Ventures," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(01), pages 1-29, January.
    16. Alberto Bettanti & Antonella Lanati & Alessandro Missoni, 2022. "Biopharmaceutical innovation ecosystems: a stakeholder model and the case of Lombardy," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 1948-1973, December.
    17. Maarten H. Batterink & Emiel F.M. Wubben & Laurens Klerkx & S.W.F. (Onno) Omta, 2010. "Orchestrating innovation networks: The case of innovation brokers in the agri-food sector," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 47-76, January.
    18. Mohammadreza Tayebnia & Nader Seyyedamiri, 2024. "The challenges and prospects of developing an innovation intermediary organization: a case study of Iran," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, December.
    19. Sepehr Ghazinoory & Maghsoud Amiri & Soroush Ghazinoori & Parisa Alizadeh, 2019. "Designing innovation policy mix: a multi-objective decision-making approach," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 365-385, May.
    20. Nasrin Sultana & Ekaterina Turkina, 2023. "Global Outward Foreign Direct Investment Network: Perspectives for Knowledge Transfer from Host Countries to Home Countries by MNEs," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-23, November.
    21. James Stewart & Sampsa Hyysalo, 2008. "Intermediaries, Users And Social Learning In Technological Innovation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 12(03), pages 295-325.
    22. Ron Adner & Rahul Kapoor, 2010. "Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 306-333, March.
    23. Noori, Javad & Bagheri Nasrabadi, Mahdi & Yazdi, Najmoddin & Babakhan, Ali Reza, 2017. "Innovative performance of Iranian knowledge-based firms: Large firms or SMEs?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 179-185.
    24. Hasan Boudlaie, 2020. "Studying the content characteristics of New Technology-Based Firms," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 3(1), pages 94-111, February.
    25. Liu, Xielin & White, Steven, 2001. "Comparing innovation systems: a framework and application to China's transitional context," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(7), pages 1091-1114, August.
    26. Jakob Edler & Jan Fagerberg, 2017. "Innovation policy: what, why, and how," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 33(1), pages 2-23.
    27. Eva Panetti & Adele Parmentola & Marco Ferretti & Elisabeth Beck Reynolds, 2020. "Exploring the relational dimension in a smart innovation ecosystem: a comprehensive framework to define the network structure and the network portfolio," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(6), pages 1775-1796, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abi Saad, Elie & Tremblay, Nathalie & Agogué, Marine, 2024. "A multi-level perspective on innovation intermediaries: The case of the diffusion of digital technologies in healthcare," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    2. Jenson, Ian & Doyle, Richard & Miles, Morgan P., 2020. "An entrepreneurial marketing process perspective of the role of intermediaries in producing innovation outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 291-299.
    3. Matias Ramirez & Ian Clarke & Laurens Klerkx, 2018. "Analysing intermediary organisations and their influence on upgrading in emerging agricultural clusters," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(6), pages 1314-1335, September.
    4. van Winden, Willem & Carvalho, Luís, 2019. "Intermediation in public procurement of innovation: How Amsterdam’s startup-in-residence programme connects startups to urban challenges," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
    5. Ileana Palaco & Suk Kyoung Kim & Min Jae Park & Jae Jeung Rho, 2022. "Exploring capabilities of international technology transfer intermediaries between emerging and developed countries," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 307-352, February.
    6. Polzin, Friedemann & von Flotow, Paschen & Klerkx, Laurens, 2016. "Addressing barriers to eco-innovation: Exploring the finance mobilisation functions of institutional innovation intermediaries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 34-46.
    7. Colovic, Ana & Caloffi, Annalisa & Rossi, Federica & Russo, Margherita, 2025. "Institutionalising the digital transition: The role of digital innovation intermediaries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    8. Selviaridis, Kostas & Hughes, Alan & Spring, Martin, 2023. "Facilitating public procurement of innovation in the UK defence and health sectors: Innovation intermediaries as institutional entrepreneurs," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(2).
    9. Caloffi, Annalisa & Colovic, Ana & Rizzoli, Valentina & Rossi, Federica, 2023. "Innovation intermediaries' types and functions: A computational analysis of the literature," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    10. Caloffi, Annalisa & Freo, Marzia & Ghinoi, Stefano & Mariani, Marco & Rossi, Federica, 2022. "Assessing the effects of a deliberate policy mix: The case of technology and innovation advisory services and innovation vouchers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(6).
    11. Anna Maria Lis & Marita McPhillips & Adrian Lis, 2020. "Sustainability of Cluster Organizations as Open Innovation Intermediaries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.
    12. De Silva, Muthu & Howells, Jeremy & Meyer, Martin, 2018. "Innovation intermediaries and collaboration: Knowledge–based practices and internal value creation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 70-87.
    13. Nilsson, Magnus & Sia-Ljungström, Clarissa, 2013. "The Role of Innovation Intermediaries in Innovation Systems," 2013 International European Forum, February 18-22, 2013, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 164741, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    14. Kerstens, Andrea & Langley, David J., 2025. "An innovation intermediary’s role in enhancing absorptive capacity for cross-industry digital innovation: Introducing an awareness capability and new intermediary practices," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    15. Daniel Feser, 2023. "To Compete or Cooperate? A Case Study of Innovation and Creativity Labs in Berlin," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(4), pages 4367-4392, December.
    16. Beau Warbroek & Thomas Hoppe & Frans Coenen & Hans Bressers, 2018. "The Role of Intermediaries in Supporting Local Low-Carbon Energy Initiatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-28, July.
    17. Kivimaa, Paula & Boon, Wouter & Hyysalo, Sampsa & Klerkx, Laurens, 2019. "Towards a typology of intermediaries in sustainability transitions: A systematic review and a research agenda," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 1062-1075.
    18. Hyysalo, Sampsa & Juntunen, Jouni K. & Martiskainen, Mari, 2018. "Energy Internet forums as acceleration phase transition intermediaries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(5), pages 872-885.
    19. Paula Kivimaa & Wouter Boon & Sampsa Hyysalo & Laurens Klerkx, 2017. "Towards a Typology of Intermediaries in Transitions: a Systematic Review," SPRU Working Paper Series 2017-17, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    20. Cuihong Zhang & Ning Liu, 2024. "Innovation intermediaries: a review, bibliometric analysis, and research agenda," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 1113-1143, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:41:y:2026:i:1:p:132-155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.