IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v40y2025i6p1326-1334.html

What a State: Why the U.S. is Still Bad for Your Health (Policy)

Author

Listed:
  • Calum Paton

Abstract

The second Trump administration's centrepiece legislation, the modestly‐named Big Beautiful Bill, passed by the House of Representatives and going through the Senate at time of writing, offers an opportunity to reflect upon how the U.S. state affects health policy and the prospects for equitable access to affordable healthcare. Is the U.S. still an outlier (by comparison with Europe and much of the world), in that its many of its citizens are either uncovered, poorly covered or tenuously and only temporarily covered by health insurance? The answer is yes. And the chipping away at Obamacare and Medicaid by Trump 2.0 (learning from his failure to repeal Obamacare in 2017) as part of the Big Beautiful Bill, shows us that it is easier for the Right to dismantle progressive social legislation than it is for the Liberal‐Left to assemble it. To understand why, and to revisit why the U.S. polity struggles to enact progressive healthcare reform, we have to understand the effect of the U.S. state (i.e. political structure) upon public policy. This article revisits the nature of that state, to depict the underlying causes of ‘American exceptionalism’ which are partly ideological but also more significantly institutional than often realised.

Suggested Citation

  • Calum Paton, 2025. "What a State: Why the U.S. is Still Bad for Your Health (Policy)," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(6), pages 1326-1334, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:40:y:2025:i:6:p:1326-1334
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.70009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.70009
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.70009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. King, Anthony, 1973. "Ideas, Institutions and the Policies of Governments: a Comparative Analysis: Parts I and II," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(3), pages 291-313, July.
    2. King, Anthony, 1973. "Ideas, Institutions and the Policies of Governments: a Comparative Analysis: Part III," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(4), pages 409-423, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Megan M. Reynolds & Ashley M. Fox & Yvette Young, 2021. "State‐level social safety nets for families coping with job loss," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(2), pages 121-138, June.
    2. Albert Weale, 2010. "Political Theory and Practical Public Reasoning," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 58(2), pages 266-281, March.
    3. Igor Makarov, 2022. "Does resource abundance require special approaches to climate policies? The case of Russia," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 170(1), pages 1-21, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:40:y:2025:i:6:p:1326-1334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.