IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v40y2025i6p1208-1219.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Out‐of‐Pocket Expenditure and its Determinants Amongst the Patients Undergoing Advanced Radiological Procedures in the Public Healthcare Facilities of Tamil Nadu, South India

Author

Listed:
  • Dhanajayan Govindan
  • Suthanthira Kannan
  • Deivasigamani Kuberan
  • Arivarasan Barathi
  • Venmathi Elangovan
  • Afrith John Poul
  • Muneera Parveen
  • Marie Gilbert Majella
  • Yuvaraj Krishnamoorthy

Abstract

Background Advanced radiological procedures, such as CT, MRI, and PET scans, are crucial for accurate diagnostics and treatment planning but often result in substantial out‐of‐pocket expenditures (OOPE) for patients, especially in developing countries like India. Despite progressive health policies in Tamil Nadu, the financial burden on patients undergoing these procedures in public healthcare facilities remains a concern. Hence, this study was done to assess the OOPE and its determinants amongst patients undergoing CT, MRI and PET scan procedures in public healthcare facilities of Tamil Nadu. Methods This cross‐sectional study analysed OOPE among 2415 patients undergoing advanced radiological procedures in public healthcare facilities across 12 districts in Tamil Nadu. A two‐step sampling strategy was employed to select 23 healthcare facilities. Patient‐level costs were calculated, including direct medical, direct non‐medical, and indirect costs. Determinants of OOPE were assessed using log‐linear regression models. Results PET scans were the costliest procedure, with median total cost per patient of INR 12,150 (USD 147.14), primarily due to direct medical expenses. Median total costs per patient for CT and MRI scans were INR 1460 (USD 17.68) and INR 3250 (USD 39.36), respectively. Factors significantly associated with higher OOPE included urban residence (e^β = 1.13 for CT; 1.17 for MRI), higher socioeconomic status (e^β = 1.25 for Class I vs. V in CT; 1.45 for Class I vs. V in MRI), lack of insurance utilisation (e^β = 1.75 for CT; 3.73 for MRI), absence of insurance (e^β = 1.89 for CT; 3.85 for MRI), greater travel distance (e^β = 1.51 for CT; 1.56 for MRI), and longer waiting times (e^β = 1.21 for CT). Conclusions The study reveals significant financial burdens on patients undergoing advanced radiological procedures, highlighting the need for policy reforms to enhance insurance coverage utilisation, reduce urban‐rural disparities, and improve access to affordable care. Addressing these determinants is crucial for reducing OOPE and ensuring equitable access to essential diagnostic services.

Suggested Citation

  • Dhanajayan Govindan & Suthanthira Kannan & Deivasigamani Kuberan & Arivarasan Barathi & Venmathi Elangovan & Afrith John Poul & Muneera Parveen & Marie Gilbert Majella & Yuvaraj Krishnamoorthy, 2025. "Out‐of‐Pocket Expenditure and its Determinants Amongst the Patients Undergoing Advanced Radiological Procedures in the Public Healthcare Facilities of Tamil Nadu, South India," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(6), pages 1208-1219, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:40:y:2025:i:6:p:1208-1219
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.70006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.70006
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.70006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:40:y:2025:i:6:p:1208-1219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.