IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v40y2025i5p1122-1139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Balancing Stakeholder Interests: A Balanced Scorecard Perspective on Performance Appraisal Implementation in China's Public Hospitals

Author

Listed:
  • Shufang Yao
  • Shaozhuang Ma
  • Lishuo Shi
  • Fang Wu
  • Elizabeth Reis

Abstract

In 2019, the Chinese government initiated a National Performance Appraisal for Tertiary Public Hospitals (the ‘National Appraisal’), but limited study has been conducted on its appraisal indicators and its implementation effects. This study aims to assess how well this system balances the interests of key stakeholders in Chinese public hospitals and examines the positive changes and concurrent challenges it has brought to hospital operations. Utilising stakeholder theory and the balanced scorecard, we conducted two rounds of Delphi consultations with experts (N1 = 46, N2 = 29). We also analysed archival data from three hospitals' ‘National Appraisal’ records covering 2018 to 2020. Additionally, we conducted semi‐structured interviews (N = 41) with key stakeholders from these hospitals. Kendall's coefficient of concordance was employed in both rounds to gauge the agreement among experts and thematic analysis was applied to analyse data from in‐depth interviews with the key stakeholders of the three sampled hospitals. The results show that: (1) The key stakeholders of Chinese public hospitals include patients, hospital executives, health care workers, health authorities, and the public, but the ‘National Appraisal’ indicators only cover the first three stakeholders; (2) The ‘National Appraisal’ system adopted a balanced scorecard approach, patient‐centre and with emphases on internal process; (3) The ‘National Appraisal’ had positive impacts on hospitals, clarifying hospital strategy and prioritising the public roles, enhancing health care quality, safety, and efficiency, as well as patient and health care worker satisfaction. However, implementation challenges arise from resource constraints, discrepancy between appraisal indicators and patient needs, misalignment between appraisal indicators and doctor's patient care practices, and the tension between nationwide standardized appraisal and local context. This study significantly contributes to the literature by empirically examining performance appraisal implementation in an under‐researched country's public hospitals, offering practical implications and policy recommendations for practitioners, managers, and policymakers.

Suggested Citation

  • Shufang Yao & Shaozhuang Ma & Lishuo Shi & Fang Wu & Elizabeth Reis, 2025. "Balancing Stakeholder Interests: A Balanced Scorecard Perspective on Performance Appraisal Implementation in China's Public Hospitals," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(5), pages 1122-1139, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:40:y:2025:i:5:p:1122-1139
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3948
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3948
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.3948?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:40:y:2025:i:5:p:1122-1139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.