Author
Listed:
- Alexandre Chakhunashvili
- Anna Blommengren
- Anna Kullberg
Abstract
To improve healthcare quality there has been a growing interest in collecting and analysing patient feedback. Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) are instruments through which the feedback can be collected and used for improvement purposes. However, the collection process is often associated with an administrative burden for healthcare professionals who collect and register surveys manually. Additionally, the manual procedure limits the data collection efforts to fewer patients, thus resulting in a less representative sample. A digital and automated procedure for collecting and visualising patient experience data can relieve healthcare staff and allow more patients to share their experiences. At Karolinska University Hospital, a multi‐disciplinary project to develop the automated PREM process—from data collection to visualisation—has been undertaken. As a result, there are about 25,000 digital questionnaires distributed per month with the response rate of approximately 35%–40%. This is an equivalent of about 9000 completed questionnaires per month to be compared to less than 1000 responses per month received during the manual process used before 2021. The large amount of patient experience data is analysed and made accessible to the hospital management and staff. To increase the transparency, part of the collected data is visualised at Karolinska's external website. Furthermore, hospital staff is relieved from all survey administration. Remaining challenges concern survey language and the analysis of textual responses that are not yet done at hospital level. Overall, this initiative has led to several quality improvement activities and contributed to strengthening Karolinska's internal learning health system.
Suggested Citation
Alexandre Chakhunashvili & Anna Blommengren & Anna Kullberg, 2025.
"Implementation of Automated PREM Process to Better Capture Patients' Overall Experience of Care Services at Karolinska University Hospital,"
International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(4), pages 838-848, July.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:40:y:2025:i:4:p:838-848
DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3918
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:40:y:2025:i:4:p:838-848. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.