IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v40y2025i3p765-775.html

Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 on Fertility: An Integrative Review

Author

Listed:
  • Wakaha Ikeda
  • Yuka Yamazaki
  • Yutaka Inaba

Abstract

This integrative review aimed to explore the impact of the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) on fertility to establish foundational knowledge and guide future epidemiological studies. The PubMed and Central Journal of Medicine databases were searched, yielding 80 relevant articles published between 2019 and 2021. Of these, 14 were published in Japanese and 66 in English. None of the Japanese studies met the inclusion criteria. Fourteen English‐language studies, all of which were retrieved from PubMed, were included in the final analysis. No relevant literature was found in the Central Journal of Medicine. The keywords used were COVID‐19, fertility, and demographics. COVID‐19 led to an increase in unplanned pregnancies and abortions in developing countries. Fever associated with the infection was suggested to have reduced sperm concentration and motility, and the spread of the infection caused young couples to delay childbearing, potentially decreasing fertility. Conversely, relatively older couples showed fewer changes in their childbearing plans, indicating that COVID‐19 had both positive and negative effects on fertility. Physical, psychological, and economic factors as well as sex, age, and cultural background exerted complex effects on fertility. Herein, the impact of social crises on fertility rates has been discussed in the context of the recent COVID‐19 pandemic. Analysing the effects of this pandemic on fertility rates is crucial for understanding future demographic trends and national strengths. This study provides valuable data for future research in this field.

Suggested Citation

  • Wakaha Ikeda & Yuka Yamazaki & Yutaka Inaba, 2025. "Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 on Fertility: An Integrative Review," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 765-775, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:40:y:2025:i:3:p:765-775
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3908
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3908
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.3908?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Angela Luci-Greulich & Olivier Thévenon, 2013. "The Impact of Family Policies on Fertility Trends in Developed Countries," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 29(4), pages 387-416, November.
    2. Jeremy Greenwood & Ananth Seshadri & Guillaume Vandenbroucke, 2005. "The Baby Boom and Baby Bust," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 95(1), pages 183-207, March.
    3. Hisakazu Kato, 2018. "The Analysis on Disparities of Fertility Rate of Japanese Municipalities," Public Policy Review, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan, vol. 14(1), pages 1-24, February.
    4. Ron Lesthaeghe, 2010. "The Unfolding Story of the Second Demographic Transition," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 36(2), pages 211-251, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. András Olivér Németh & Petra Németh & László Tőkés, 2025. "Empirical analysis of the differences in the drivers of fertility between CEE countries and the rest of the EU," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 1-25, June.
    2. Julia Hellstrand & Jessica Nisén & Vitor Miranda & Peter Fallesen & Lars Dommermuth & Mikko Myrskylä, 2020. "Not just later, but fewer: novel trends in cohort fertility in the Nordic countries," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2020-007, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    3. Slätis, Victor, 2026. "The Modernity Trap : Structural Constraints on Fertility in Wealthy Democracies," SocArXiv xbe6p_v1, Center for Open Science.
    4. Martin Klesment & Leen Rahnu & Luule Sakkeus & Allan Puur, 2014. "Varying association between education and second births in Europe," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 31(27), pages 813-860.
    5. Martin Bujard, 2011. "Family Policy And Demographic Effects: The Case Of Germany," Demográfia, Hungarian Demographic Research Institute, vol. 54(5), pages 56-78.
    6. repec:osf:osfxxx:3qzy6_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Julia Hellstrand & Jessica Nisén & Mikko Myrskylä, 2019. "All-time low period fertility in Finland: drivers, tempo effects, and cohort implications," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2019-006, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    8. Larry Jones & Alice Schoonbrodt, 2016. "Baby Busts and Baby Booms: The Fertility Response to Shocks in Dynastic Models," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 22, pages 157-178, October.
    9. Guillaume Vandenbroucke, 2008. "The American Frontier: Technology versus Immigration," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 11(2), pages 283-301, April.
    10. Larry E. Jones & Michèle Tertilt, 2006. "An Economic History of Fertility in the U.S.: 1826-1960," NBER Working Papers 12796, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Kryštof Zeman & Eva Beaujouan & Zuzanna Brzozowska & Tomáš Sobotka, 2018. "Cohort fertility decline in low fertility countries: Decomposition using parity progression ratios," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 38(25), pages 651-690.
    12. Marcel Raab & Emanuela Struffolino, 2020. "The Heterogeneity of Partnership Trajectories to Childlessness in Germany," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 36(1), pages 53-70, March.
    13. Gøsta Esping-Andersen & Francesco C. Billari, 2015. "Re-theorizing Family Demographics," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 41(1), pages 1-31, March.
    14. James Raymo & Brienna Perelli-Harris & Sojung Lim & Alicia VanOrman & Miho Iwasawa & Marcia Carlson, 2015. "Educational differences in early childbearing," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 33(3), pages 65-92.
    15. Frances Goldscheider & Eva Bernhardt & Trude Lappegård, 2015. "The Gender Revolution: A Framework for Understanding Changing Family and Demographic Behavior," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 41(2), pages 207-239, June.
    16. Katarzyna Lubiewska & Marta Żegleń & Karolina Głogowska & Nebi Sümer & Yanina Kashuba, 2025. "Buffering and ambiguity effects of maternal warmth on associations between psychological control and child attachment in a cross-national perspective," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    17. Thomas Baudin & David de la Croix & Paula E. Gobbi, 2015. "Fertility and Childlessness in the United States," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(6), pages 1852-1882, June.
    18. Goksel, Türkmen & Gurdal, Mehmet Y. & Orman, Cuneyt, 2014. "The baby boom, baby busts, and the role of grandmothers in childcare," MPRA Paper 65438, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Sigle, Wendy, 2021. "Demography’s theory and approach: (how) has the view from the margins changed?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112467, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    20. Allan Puur & Luule Sakkeus & Asta Põldma & Anne Herm, 2011. "Intergenerational family constellations in contemporary Europe," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 25(4), pages 135-172.
    21. Luppi, Francesca & BONANOMI, Andrea & Rosina, Alessandro, 2025. "Self-Fulfilment and Fertility Intentions: The Interplay of Cultural Values and Expected Welfare State Support," SocArXiv uhgnx_v1, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:40:y:2025:i:3:p:765-775. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.