IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v40y2025i3p752-764.html

Prevalence and Associated Factors of Long‐Acting and Permanent Methods (LAPMs) of Family Planning Among Women of Reproductive Age: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Ayşe Taştekin
  • Tuğçe Ok

Abstract

Aim To examine the prevalence and associated factors of long‐acting and permanent methods of family planning (LAPMs) in women of reproductive age. Background LAPMs reduce the rate of unwanted pregnancy. Understanding the prevalence and associated factors of LAPMs is the key to preventing unwanted pregnancies. Methods In this systematic review and meta‐analysis study, data from seven studies involving 1187 women, conducted between 2013 and 2022, were analysed by searching EBSCOhost, Google Scholar, Pubmed, Science Direct, Scopus, Web of Science, and ProQuest databases. PRISMA 2020 guidelines were followed in this study. Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Evaluation tools were used to evaluate the quality of the studies. Results The prevalence of LAPMs in women of reproductive age was 27.3%. Women with secondary education or higher, with three or more children, and who do not want to have more children use long‐acting and permanent methods more. Conclusions Our results can guide the development of strategies to be applied to prevent unintended pregnancies and to increase the use of LAPMs in women of reproductive age.

Suggested Citation

  • Ayşe Taştekin & Tuğçe Ok, 2025. "Prevalence and Associated Factors of Long‐Acting and Permanent Methods (LAPMs) of Family Planning Among Women of Reproductive Age: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 752-764, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:40:y:2025:i:3:p:752-764
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3895
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3895
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.3895?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philile Shongwe & Busisiwe Ntuli & Sphiwe Madiba, 2019. "Assessing the Acceptability of Vasectomy as a Family Planning Option: A Qualitative Study with Men in the Kingdom of Eswatini," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Debayan Pakrashi & Surya Nath Maiti & Abhishek Gautam & Priya Nanda & Kakoli Borkotoky & Nitin Datta, 2022. "Family planning campaigns on television and contraceptive use in India," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(3), pages 1492-1511, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Godswill Nwabuisi Osuafor & Monica Ewomazino Akokuwebe & Erhabor Sunday Idemudia, 2023. "Male Involvement in Family Planning Decisions in Malawi and Tanzania: What Are the Determinants?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Debayan Pakrashi & Sarani Saha, 2024. "Intergenerational consequences of spousal violence: effect on nutritional status of children," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 67-94, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:40:y:2025:i:3:p:752-764. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.