IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v40y2025i3p672-687.html

The Organisational Infrastructure of a Canadian Rural Health Network: A Four‐Year Longitudinal Survey Study

Author

Listed:
  • Anshu Parajulee
  • Gal Av‐Gay
  • Tom Skinner
  • Jude Kornelsen

Abstract

Background Formal networks are increasingly being used as a strategy to address complex health system issues. This study aimed to understand the organisational performance of a novel network, the Rural Surgical and Obstetrical Networks (RSON) in the Canadian province of British Columbia, as it developed and grew over four years. Methods Between 2019 and 2022, we administrated an annual 37‐item survey on network organisational aspects with RSON leaders. We calculated the percentage of favourable ratings (four or five rating out of five) for each survey item and used a two‐tailed Wilcoxon Mann‐Whitney rank sum test to compare ratings over time. Key themes in respondent comments were described narratively. Results Over four years, we distributed 114 survey invitations to RSON leaders and received 77 responses. From 2019 to 2022, 24 out of 37 survey items (65%) had a statistically significant increase in ratings. Ratings and comments indicated that RSON could have improved its function by (a) including more peripheral network members in decision‐making and (b) formalising structures and processes for some network areas. Findings also indicate the presence of three network tensions within RSON: inclusiveness versus efficiency, stability versus flexibility, and network operations versus health system operations. Conclusion Study findings validate and build on existing network theories and provide practical learnings for other jurisdictions interested in implementing a network like RSON. Among the tensions identified within RSON, the network operations versus health system operations tension, specific to a healthcare delivery setting, has not been well described previously.

Suggested Citation

  • Anshu Parajulee & Gal Av‐Gay & Tom Skinner & Jude Kornelsen, 2025. "The Organisational Infrastructure of a Canadian Rural Health Network: A Four‐Year Longitudinal Survey Study," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 672-687, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:40:y:2025:i:3:p:672-687
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3898
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3898
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.3898?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicolaj Siggelkow & Jan W. Rivkin, 2005. "Speed and Search: Designing Organizations for Turbulence and Complexity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 101-122, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jörg Claussen & Tobias Kretschmer & Nils Stieglitz, 2015. "Vertical Scope, Turbulence, and the Benefits of Commitment and Flexibility," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(4), pages 915-929, April.
    2. Ramon Rico & Cristina Gibson & Miriam Sanchez-Manzanares & Mark A. Clark, 2020. "Team adaptation and the changing nature of work: Lessons from practice, evidence from research, and challenges for the road ahead," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(3), pages 507-526, August.
    3. Ayamga, Matthew & Annosi, Maria Carmela & Kassahun, Ayalew & Dolfsma, Wilfred & Tekinerdogan, Bedir, 2024. "Adaptive organizational responses to varied types of failures: Empirical insights from technology providers in Ghana," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    4. Sai Yayavaram & Wei-Ru Chen, 2015. "Changes in firm knowledge couplings and firm innovation performance: The moderating role of technological complexity," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 377-396, March.
    5. Nobuyuki Hanaki & Hideo Owan, 2013. "Autonomy, Conformity and Organizational Learning," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-21, July.
    6. Leroux, Erick & Pupion, Pierre-Charles, 2022. "Smart territories and IoT adoption by local authorities: A question of trust, efficiency, and relationship with the citizen-user-taxpayer," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    7. Friederike Wall, 2024. "Incomplete incentive contracts in complex task environments: an agent-based simulation with minimal intelligence agents," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 19(3), pages 523-552, July.
    8. Donal Crilly & Pamela Sloan, 2014. "Autonomy or Control? Organizational Architecture and Corporate Attention to Stakeholders," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 339-355, April.
    9. Sasanka Sekhar Chanda & Sougata Ray, 2025. "Is comprehensiveness in making strategic decisions always helpful?," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 50(4), pages 1011-1036, November.
    10. Xuefeng Liu & Hanzhi Yu & Guowei Lai & Shuxiao Wang & Yuying Xie, 2022. "Imitation or Innovation? Research on the Path Selection of Enterprise Performance Improvement from the Perspective of Organizational Ecology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
    11. Massimo G. Colombo & Keld Laursen & Mats Magnusson & Cristina Rossi-Lamastra, 2011. "Organizing Inter- and Intra-Firm Networks: What is the Impact on Innovation Performance?," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(6), pages 531-538, August.
    12. Henrique M. Barros & Sergio G. Lazzarini, 2009. "Meritocracy and Innovation: Is There a Link? Empirical Evidence from Firms in Brazil," Business and Economics Working Papers 072, Unidade de Negocios e Economia, Insper.
    13. Hunt, Richard A. & Townsend, David M. & Lerner, Daniel A. & Brownell, Katrina M., 2024. "Pivot, persist or perish? Knowledge problems and the extraordinarily tight boundary conditions of entrepreneurs as scientists," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 21(C).
    14. Myong-Hun Chang & Joseph E. Harrington, 2007. "Innovators, Imitators, and the Evolving Architecture of Problem-Solving Networks," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 648-666, August.
    15. Andreas Blume & April Mitchell Franco & Paul Heidhues, 2021. "Dynamic coordination via organizational routines," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 72(4), pages 1001-1047, November.
    16. Jiunyan Wu & Takaki Ohya & Tomoki Sekiguchi, 2024. "Applications of agent-based modeling and simulation in organization management: a quarter-century review through bibliometric mapping (1998–2022)," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 1-31, March.
    17. He Li & Pengyan Zhao, 2025. "Visual Mapping Analysis of International Research Hotspots and Trends for the MBTI Test," International Journal of Contemporary Education, Redfame publishing, vol. 8(2), pages 11-20, October.
    18. Anselm Schneider & Christopher Wickert & Emilio Marti, 2017. "Reducing Complexity by Creating Complexity: A Systems Theory Perspective on How Organizations Respond to Their Environments," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 182-208, March.
    19. Erin K. Melton, 2017. "Testing Turbulence: Exploring the Determinants of Managerial Networking," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 19-37, March.
    20. Giannoccaro, Ilaria, 2015. "Adaptive supply chains in industrial districts: A complexity science approach focused on learning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PB), pages 576-589.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:40:y:2025:i:3:p:672-687. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.