IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v39y2024i4p1131-1145.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A systematic review of qualitative research on the self‐management experience of breast cancer patients

Author

Listed:
  • Xi‐Bo Sun
  • He‐Peng Su
  • He Jiang
  • Bing Wang
  • Shuai Lu
  • Jin‐Xiu Qu
  • Xiang‐Qi Li
  • Ben‐Qiang Rao

Abstract

Objective To integrate the qualitative research on the self‐management experience of breast cancer patients and conduct a systematic review of their self‐management experience. Methods Using a computer to search a series of databases such as CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and China Biomedical Database, systematically collect and integrate qualitative research on the self‐management experience of breast cancer patients, and the search time is limited to January 2010 to December 2022. The qualitative research quality evaluation standard of the Joanna Briggs Institute Centre for Evidence‐Based Health Care in Australia was used as the evaluation standard of this project to complete the accurate evaluation of the literature; Meta‐analysis was used to complete the effective integration of the results. Results 17 pieces of literature were included in this project, and 37 research results with strong integrity were extracted accordingly. On this basis, 7 different categories were summarised, and three integrated results were obtained: the experience of maintaining self‐management, symptom recognition, and self‐management. Conclusion In the different stages of self‐management of breast cancer patients, medical staff should give targeted guidance to help patients obtain a good prognosis.

Suggested Citation

  • Xi‐Bo Sun & He‐Peng Su & He Jiang & Bing Wang & Shuai Lu & Jin‐Xiu Qu & Xiang‐Qi Li & Ben‐Qiang Rao, 2024. "A systematic review of qualitative research on the self‐management experience of breast cancer patients," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 1131-1145, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:39:y:2024:i:4:p:1131-1145
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3765
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3765
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.3765?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:39:y:2024:i:4:p:1131-1145. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.