IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v37y2022i3p1799-1815.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Costs of unnecessary repeated diagnostic tests in cholecystectomy

Author

Listed:
  • Hüseyin Aslan
  • Mehmet Top

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to calculate the number, rate and cost of unnecessarily repeated tests on the patients who underwent open cholecystectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy and figure out the share of the unnecessarily repeated test costs in total test expenditures and total treatment expenditures. Alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate transaminase, gamma glutamyl transferase, Total bilirubin, whole abdominal ultrasonography, upper abdominal ultrasonography, hepatobiliary ultrasonography tests, which were among the tests used in the patients who underwent cholecystectomy. The research group included 1296 patients. All records of the patients within totally 180 days of period including 90 days of pre‐cholecystectomy and 90 days of post‐cholecystectomy period were analysed. Necessity/Unnecessary criteria of the tests were identified in accordance with literature data, expert opinions and American Society of Anaesthesiologists Physical Status Classification scores. It was determined that unnecessary test costs consisted of 8.48% of the total test costs and 0.93% of the total treatment expenditures. This study showed that age, gender, surgical technique, and American Society of Anesthesiologists scores significantly differentiated unnecessary repeated test costs. Reducing the use of excessive health service and the related health expenditures, working to reveal its financial and medical benefits are crucial for the reimbursement agency, health service hosts and patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Hüseyin Aslan & Mehmet Top, 2022. "Costs of unnecessary repeated diagnostic tests in cholecystectomy," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(3), pages 1799-1815, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:37:y:2022:i:3:p:1799-1815
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3442
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3442
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.3442?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:37:y:2022:i:3:p:1799-1815. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.